Faced with obstruction, the controversy in session shall be canceled | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.


HAS The origin, the textual content included solely eight articles, aimed toward lightening the obstacles complicating entry to water, the usage of phytosanitary merchandise approved in Europe or the development of farming buildings … But on the eve of its examination in session, scheduled from May 26 to 31, the invoice aimed toward lightening the constraints within the occupation of farmer, written within the wake of the nice agricultural revolt of final winter. 3,526 amendments had been deposited, most of them by environmental teams and LFI, decided to dam the textual content in any respect prices. “Among them, 1,200 amendments create new articles … It is total delirium, pure obstruction”, storms the rapporteur (LR) of the textual content Julien Dive. “There is totally no probability {that a} regulation of 1,200 articles shall be debated, even much less adopted by the tip of the extraordinary session. It is a maneuver to kill it. Including act. »»

The political e-newsletter

Every Monday at 11:30 am

Receive the political data and political evaluation in preview.

THANKS !
Your registration has been taken under consideration with the e-mail handle:

To uncover all of our different newsletters, go right here: my account

By registering, you settle for the final situations of use and our privateness coverage.

A rejection movement was subsequently filed on Friday night, co -signed by the 4 presidents of the appropriate and heart teams: Laurent Wauquiez (DR), Marc Fesneau (Democrats), Gabriel Attal (EPR) and Paul Christophe (Horizons.) Concretely, after his adoption on Monday, the textual content from the Senate (together with his eight articles) shall be returned to the joint joint fee, the place deputies and deputies and deputies and Right and heart senators are within the majority. “It’s baroque, however it’s the solely method to save this regulation. We can have variations of views, however insulting farmers at this level just isn’t tolerable, “supports a relative of the majority.

“Crazy” measures that prohibit irrigation

Since its validation in the Senate on January 18, this so-called “anti-entrade” bill, during the agricultural orientation law promulgated in March, electrifies opposition to the National Assembly, where environmentalists and the left have erected it as a symbol of the “recoil” of the government on the environmental level. His examination in the Sustainable Development Committee, chaired by organic farmer Sandrine Le Feur, was a way of the cross. While the initial text aimed to facilitate adaptation to global warming, by pragmatically framing access to water for farmers, a series of articles have been added, leading to “prohibiting purely and easily irrigation in France”, deciphers Carole Zakine, lawyer specializing in environmental law. “The debates had been lunar … The deputies refused to acknowledge that the watering of animals was a part of a balanced administration of water. »»

In the countryside, the “crazy” preparations added by environmentalists have raised an actual panic. “They have prohibited that the water companies might finance substitution deductions. Decreed a ten -year moratorium on reserves. They have banned the irrigation of intermediate crops and all land-all, do you notice? – Who wouldn’t be natural! It is kind of merely the tip of irrigation in France, and the introduced dying of agriculture, “panics Eric Frétillère, president of the irrigators of France. Hanging on debates, French farmers, who retain only 5 % of precipitation and today only irrigue 6 % of their land (against respectively 50 % and 20 % in Spain), have not returned. “The debates had been extraordinarily dogmatic, as if international warming didn’t exist,” concedes an adviser to the government. “In session, we had the feeling of being faced with religious. An LFI MP has even melted in tears! »»

Political totems

These measures, leading to the campaigns to thunderstorm and precipitate the increase in imports and the desertification of the territory, went completely unnoticed by the general public. In the media, the debate has focused on another article, aimed at reintroducing, in a very supervised way and for only 120 days, on a derogatory, an insecticide of the family of neonicotinoids, acetamipride.


To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

Answer



Authorized in every single place else in Europe, broadly utilized in France in animal necklaces and as anti-Founds, the “cursed” insecticide has change into a totem-and an actual ball for accused deputies, of their constituencies, of eager to “poison the French. “It is not potential, in France, to rationally method these topics”, notes a macronist deputy. The provisions of the text on the redefinition of the priorities of ANSES, the supervision of agents of the French Biodiversity Office (OFB) … “This textual content has solely irritants”, recognizes the entourage of the Minister of Agriculture Annie Genevard, who will have tried until the end of carrying measures “important to the restoration of our productions”.

Exasperated, farmers called for a national demonstration on May 26. “We only ask for one thing: to have the same means of production as our neighbors in Europe. In what sick minds can it be perceived as a scandal? “Rums a younger farmer. For the federal government, divided on the topic and which has by no means actually determined what agricultural coverage he meant to hold, the disaster is way from being resolved.


https://www.lepoint.fr/politique/loi-agricole-face-a-l-obstruction-le-debat-en-seance-va-etre-annule-24-05-2025-2590422_20.php