“Child protection is not a priority for the authorities” | EUROtoday

It must be said clearly, the theme is not necessarily a priority for several reasons: minors do not vote and the fight against violence against minors costs money, it does not report. We have nothing to seize. When we challenge the authors, unlike the drugs or pure financial files, we do not grasp any criminal or very little. In an incest file for example, we are not going to seize the house which served the commission of facts … where would the victim go then?

The authorities forget or do not want to see that when we protect a child, we act actively on the future of our society, clearly we bet on the future. When we protect children, we also act so that they are not the authors, tomorrow. For an upcoming conference, I reviewed seven files of OFMIN concerning minors who are authors of sexual violence. Well, everyone said they had been victims of sexual violence. This reproduction dynamic must be taken into account.

The CIIVISE (Independent Commission on Incest and Sexual Violence against children) has estimated what is the absence of assumption of victims of sexual violence in childhood. Per year, it is 9.6 billion euros spent by the State, because it includes the problems of addiction, dropping out, lack of training, psychological, drug care, etc. Better support for victims would prevent there be news.

Is it on prevention that there is a room for maneuver?

Yes, I think it intimately. Investigators must be able to focus on files with the most serious offenses. With good multidisciplinary prevention for the whole of society, certain cyberpedocriminal phenomena, such as the grooming Or sextrition, could initiate a drastic drop in cases. An example: it is necessary to explain to everyone that from an innocuous image of a child, an artificial intelligence tool can create pedocriminal content which will serve as a means of pressure to obtain from this same child another content often more violent, humiliating or degrading when at the base he had only made a photo of him leaving a victorious football or rugby match. This would make it possible to understand the minors and their entourage that we must avoid posting photos of them.

Within the association, I have both a mission of alert on these subjects but also a role of highlighting all the legislative developments necessary to be as close as possible to the reality of illicit behavior committed with regard to minors. For example, sexual deepfakes, it is an offense created within the framework of the SREN law (secure and regulate the digital space) in 2024 but no one thought of including an aggravating circumstance when the content created stage minors.

What are your other missions?

I occupy the post of director of the Digital Violence Observatory made to the miners E-E-Enfance 3018. This association has held since its creation in 2005, and since the listening platform is 3018, a mass of data that must be processed, analyzing, highlighting with regard to pedocriminal phenomena and online harassment or not. The goal is to be as close as possible to what children live online, preserve them or take care of them correctly.

Each year a transparency report will be transmitted to the Arcom since the association has been “belief signaleur” since last November and can directly request cuts in content from net platforms. In this context, I will carry out a state of the threat, an inventory of digital violence against children. This will aim to support the orientations of public policies in this area.

The other part that I would like to develop within e-childish is international cooperation. Because via new modes of communication, the victim can be in France and the author at the other end of the world. The links with European bodies, in which many challenges are played out and the network that I have been able to develop abroad for many years, will most certainly be an asset for e-child.

How does the association you join work with the police?

To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

I’ve been working with e-childings for ten years. He is a para-institutional trusted associate. This acknowledged public utility affiliation works with OFMIN, the OCRETH (Central Office for the Repression of the Trading of Human beings), Pharos, with the devoted nationwide gendarmerie providers, many ministries (National Education, Justice, Health, Interior). Via quantity 3018, E-Enfance receives testimonials from kids and pedocriminal content material, since kids could make screenshots of what they endure and put them in security within the secure of the cellular software 3018. It is commonly simpler for kids to denounce what they endure by the chat of the appliance than to name and communicate to an grownup.

Thus, along with the direct motion of the affiliation with web platforms to have the accounts blocked and delete illicit content material, e-child now has the opportunity of immediately reporting to investigators notably worrying conditions and which name for fast intervention by repressive providers. We all achieve effectivity for kids. So I’ll proceed to work with my former colleagues, however in one other means.