Brexit ‘sabotage’ warning as new proposals clear Commons | EUROtoday

New product security proposals have moved nearer to turning into regulation, sparking claims they might allow ministers to “sabotage” Brexit.

MPs voted 264 to 99, a majority of 165, to approve the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill at its third studying. The invoice supplies the federal government with new powers to manage the advertising and use of products within the UK post-Brexit.

However, TUV chief Jim Allister voiced considerations about particular references to “EU law” throughout the invoice. He questioned whether or not this might permit ministers to behave in opposition to the 2016 referendum end result.

Critics worry the laws would pressure UK laws to mechanically align with adjustments in European Union regulation, granting ministers “inappropriately wide” powers to rewrite laws.

Mr Allister, the MP for North Antrim, advised the Commons: “There are aspects of this Bill which I think are democratically dangerous.

“Because this Bill gifts to government unbridled capacity to make regulations, with virtually no oversight from this elected House, on matters which touch not just upon the sanctity of our product production, but the sovereignty of this nation.

“This Bill, with little attempt at subtlety, is a vehicle which enables a Government, if so minded – and this one, I fear, might be – to sabotage Brexit in many ways.

“I stand to be corrected, but I don’t think a single member of this Government voted for Brexit, and yet that is the settled and declared will of the people, greatest number of people who ever participated in a democratic vote in this nation.

“Yet in the Bill, we have the capacity, particularly through clause 2(7), to dynamically align all our regulations with those of the EU, and to do that without recourse to this House, at the whim of the executive. Whatever the subject matter, that surely is a most unhealthy situation.”

open picture in gallery

Shadow enterprise minister Dame Harriett Baldwin additionally stated: “As an independent nation, the UK we believe should set its own product regulations to foster innovation, support domestic industry, and not automatically align with EU rules which we no longer have any influence or help to shape.”

Responding, enterprise minister Justin Madders advised the Commons: “The powers in this Bill give the UK the flexibility to manage its own product regulatory framework.

“Part of this is of course making sure that the UK can respond to relevant developments in EU law, and this does not mean that the UK is beholden to EU changes, and all regulations will be subject to Parliament oversight.”

He added that “the reason why the Bill explicitly references the EU rather than other jurisdictions is because most of our product regulation is of course inherited from EU law”.