Fall Stefan Gelbhaar: Greens current experiences – and provides errors | EUROtoday

It is and stays a difficult case for the Greens. The occasion has accomplished the processing of the alleged Metoo affair round its former member of the Bundestag Stefan Gelbhaar-with the end result that the ombuds’ course of is just not continued and the admission that there will be no remaining clarification within the matter. This outcomes from a report of the fee utilized by the occasion, which ought to study the incidents and an accompanying classification of the occasion government. Both paperwork that the Greens need to launch on Thursday had been stern upfront.

The inexperienced rooms in it. An ombuds process has by no means been in a position to meet the declare to make a remaining classification of the experiences and its fact content material, in keeping with the Federal Executive Board report. “We should have countered this unfulfilled expectation of the ombuds’ process at an early stage and had to recognize the limits of the existing procedure to solve the conflict in this situation.”

After allegations towards yellow hair had been expressed in December, within the beginning Bundestag election marketing campaign, initially internally, later additionally publicly through media experiences, yellow hair not ran for the Bundestag election. In the occasion of a repetition for the direct mandate, his district affiliation not set him up – later the extreme allegations of misconduct fell collectively as a result of they had been clearly falsified.

The inexperienced time has been launched round half a yr to make clear the processes. One knew that “many would have liked to have the report faster and that the past few months were stressful for everyone involved,” mentioned occasion chief Franziska Brantner the stern. “But we took the time that requires such a complex case.”

In reality, the case is sophisticated. This additionally consists of that the Greens now must admit that the ombudsman, a contact level for confidential, inner occasion battle decision, has turn out to be “unintentionally on the object of possible political instrumentalization” earlier than it’s concerned. After the district politician Shirin Kreße claimed in a gathering of the Berlin left wing that a number of girls had advised her about sexual harassment by Stefan Gelbhaar, the board of administrators pointed to the ombudsman of the Federal Party. Among different issues, the impression was given, albeit unintentionally: “Anyone who wants to influence the list of lists at the expense of Stefan Gelbhaar must contact the ombudsman,” mentioned the Federal Executive Board.

In the tip, the group “did not meet its responsibility towards everyone involved,” the Federal Executive Board reported. In this case, it was “structurally overwhelmed” on this case, through which many components got here collectively – time stress earlier than the Bundestag election, incorrect media reporting, lack of confidentiality of the process. Sufferers are Stefan Gelbhaar, in addition to the individuals who submitted experiences, “who were initially not given sufficient trust in their descriptions after the false identity of another message was discovered,” emphasize the Greens.

Was Stefan Gelbhaar wrongly led to his candidate for the Bundestag? The occasion doesn’t give a easy reply to this query. The Federal Executive Board can not and doesn’t need to do justice to the need for a transparent and remaining clarification within the sense of rehabilitation or sanctions, “says the report of the board.

The experiences described touched “questions of the equal cooperation, respect for the limits of others, the reflection of power relationships that arise from political positions”. To this finish, a company should behave that neither an ombudsman nor a fee, and no board of administrators can try this on behalf of the entire occasion. “The decision about personnel constellations is always the responsibility of the respective election meetings.”

In the consequence, which means that the visitors politician, who was sitting within the Bundestag previously, was beforehand the top of the Berlin Greens, want to proceed to pursue political ambitions, can be at his district affiliation in Pankow or the Berlin State Association. It is open whether or not it should occur once more in keeping with this historical past.

The undeniable fact that the federal government board doesn’t need to hit one aspect additionally follows from the Commission’s findings: According to this, a lot of the experiences offered towards yellow -haired experiences “do not relevant to criminal behavior”, however “perceptions of this perceived by this”. According to the Commission, among the experiences had been additionally related to the purpose of stopping a candidacy of yellow -haired within the upcoming Bundestag election – and never, to attain confidential clarification between the events involved in an ombuds process. The Commission attributes the experiences with this request of the Berlin Green Youth or their environment.

At the identical time, the Commission acknowledges that there have been “obviously a number of women” within the Berlin State Association, “which felt affected by the possibly attacked but not criminal behavior”. The Federal Executive Board emphasizes that ladies from each wings, with and regardless of the Green Youth – had reported to each the ombudsman and the Commission, and “reported experiences and observations that are not relevant under criminal law, but were perceived as infringing, inappropriate or attacking”.

The inexperienced episodes of the Commission’s advice to not proceed the ombuds’ course of within the case of yellow hair. According to the Commission, the earlier process “has a lack of internal party legitimacy, a lack of structures of trust and a lack of procedural order as well as to considerable deficits and deficiency deficiencies”. The Federal Executive Board emphasizes that within the majority the reporting girls didn’t anticipate the ombuds’ process – however an “recognition of their experience”. Whether the Federal Executive Board experiences are ample for this appears open to questionable.

In any case, the Greens need to reorganize the buildings for future circumstances. A working group ought to care for this. Action ought to be each “the rule of law, democratic legitimation and feminist requirements in order to meet the perspective of those affected”. At the occasion congress in November, the brand new construction within the statutes is to be anchored.

“The area of ​​tension between the protection of those affected and the maintenance of the rule of law is not easy and, above all, not one -sided,” mentioned occasion chairman Felix Banaszak the stern. “This requires clearly anchored procedures and resources.” That is why Anne Lütkes and Jerzy Monday are very grateful for the work they’ve carried out because the leaders of the Commission and the suggestions for the longer term checklist of the ombuds buildings.

Each group is “confronted with border violations and the question of the correct use of it, so our”, “continues Banaszak. One wants to be a party in which a “tradition of appreciation and respect for the bounds of others”.

From the yellow hair case, the Greens draw a bitter conclusion for all upcoming Metoo debates. “The hurdles – especially for women – to report, display, display or address them in an organization, have also increased significantly,” the report mentioned. For instance, not just for the individuals concerned on this process, however “generally great damage was created for the concern of a reasonable handling of border violations”.