New judicial setback for Rokhaya Diallo in opposition to Pascal Bruckner | EUROtoday
Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.
RElaxed for the primary time on June 25, 2024 within the defamation trial that the “Afro-feminist” activist Rokhaya Diallo, the author Pascal Bruckner, intentible to him was once more put out of the court docket of enchantment, which, furthermore, grants him the advantage of “good faith”. “The disputed remarks [de Pascal Bruckner] As part of a debate of major general interest relating to the terrorist attacks of January 2015 and the responsibilities incurred; They were held during a lively television debate, opposing two personalities committed to the opposite ideological convictions, “remembers in a judgment of June 19, 2025 the jurisdiction of the second diploma (press chamber). “Admittedly, Pascal Bruckner stated his point of view affirmatively and repeated, but […] The civil party, present on the television set, could contradict it and explain it. In addition, it is not established that Pascal Bruckner was moved by an animosity of a personal nature towards Rokhaya Diallo. Under these conditions, the pronouncement of a condemnation, even civil, would undermine a disproportionate attack on freedom of expression and would be likely to take a deterrent effect for the exercise of this freedom. »»
That the founding father of the motion “the indivisible” reproached the creator of Gall moonsfervent defender of secularism, freedom of expression and the correct to spiritual criticism? To perceive the springs of this affair, a bit step again is crucial …
In 2006, Charlie Hebdo Publishes caricatures of the prophet Muhamm with the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. This publication applies to Charb, director of publication, to be threatened with demise and to reside underneath everlasting police safety. On the night time of 1er As of November 2, 2011, a Molotov cocktail was launched in opposition to the facade of the constructing of Charlieravaging the newspaper premises.
Polemia
Four days later, on November 5, 2011, a discussion board entitled “For the defense of freedom of expression, against support for Charlie Hebdo Is published on the site of the Party of the Natives of the Republic. Among the signatories Figure Rokhaya Diallo, who presents himself as “intersectional and decolonial activist”. The text minimizes the attack on the Molotov cocktail, claiming that it “doesn’t deserve a media and political mobilization larger than that which event the hearth or the bag of a mosque or a Muslim cemetery”. “On the opposite hand,” continues the gallery in reference to the ban on the full veil in public space, a freedom is indeed threatened: that of women who would like to dress as they see fit, without a national state-laic imposing a Dress of good Muslim Hair in the wind. “La Tribune refuses any” apitation “to journalists of Charlie Hebdo And evokes “disgust” within the face of “the trademark of the weekly: a primary anticlericalism doubled by an Islamophobic obsession”.
Four years later the drama happens: on January 7, 2015, the Kouachi brothers entered armed within the editorial corridor of Charlie Hebdo And open fireplace. Twelve individuals are murdered, together with Charb and 7 different journalists and designers.
October 21, 2020, throughout this system 28 minutes On Arte, Pascal Bruckner debates with Rokhaya Diallo. The author then accuses the activist of getting, by his tribune of 2011, “armed the arm of the killers” and “pushed to hatred”, contributing with others to “the death of the twelve of Charlie Hebdo ». Shocked, Rokhaya Diallo leaves the set, screaming to the “scandal” and promising to file a complaint against his opponent.
What she will do on November 25, 2020 in a defamation action against Pascal Bruckner.
The case was examined on May 21, 2024 before the 17the Chamber of the Paris judicial court. Pascal Bruckner, defended by Me Richard Malka, maintains that the 2011 tribune participated in creating “a hostile ambiance” that led to the attack. Rokhaya Diallo recognizes that the text was “unsuitable” in view of the tragic events that occurred then, but refuses to be associated with terrorism.
On June 25, 2024, Pascal Bruckner was released. The magistrates believe that he expressed “a crucial and subjective viewpoint” in the context of a legitimate debate, imputing to Rokhaya Diallo a “purely ethical duty” without going beyond the limits of freedom of expression.
“Serious accusations”
Following this decision, the activist invites her sympathizers to mobilize “in opposition to racism which is propagated with impunity on the units and on the road”. On X (ex-Twitter), Rokhaya Diallo criticizes the “severe accusations” against her and tending to establish a link between “black and Muslim girls” and terrorism.
Pascal Bruckner has not exceeded the eligible limits of freedom of expression (Paris Court of Appeal).
To uncover
The kangaroo of the day
Answer
Faced with the impossibility, for a civil get together, to enchantment to the legal, she seized the court docket of enchantment to civilian, with out extra success. “If it is, of course, allowed to criticize Charlie Hebdothe fact remains that this text [la tribune signée en 2011 par Rokhaya Diallo] Use very strong terms against the satirical newspaper, likely to have an influence on people opposed to this press organ and its publications, “notes the court docket. “No civil faults based on public defamation towards an individual will be retained against Pascal Bruckner, who has not exceeded the eligible limits of freedom of expression in such a context. The judgment will be confirmed in that it dismissed Rokhaya Diallo of its requests, ”concludes the judgment rendered on June 19.
“Again, justice considers that Pascal Bruckner could freely report his point of view on the intellectual responsibility of Ms. Diallo,” feedback Me Richard Malka. “This time, she additionally thought of that he had good causes to specific this opinion, with regard to the violence of the writings of Rokhaya Diallo in opposition to Charlie Hebdoafter the newspaper’s legal fireplace. A public individual can not muzzle criticism on her positions, she should assume what she says. »»
https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/nouveau-revers-judiciaire-pour-rokhaya-diallo-contre-pascal-bruckner-23-06-2025-2592714_23.php