Some 150 conservatives demand from politicians to maneuver away from the technical debate about Sijena’s work: “It is not a flag” | News from Catalonia | EUROtoday

Finish because it ends, the case of the dispute over the Romanesque work of Sijena can develop into a earlier than and after on the earth of restoration and conservation of the historic heritage of Spain. The noise raised thus far has achieved that some 150 specialists within the subject have determined to interrupt their silence and signal a manifesto that claims to political leaders who’re abstracted to med For the advantage of the entire society, given its patrimonial significance. ” And they reject every kind of “coercion” about specialists who should discover a resolution, in order that they demand that they allow them to work “with peace of mind and independence” to realize an “optimal solution.”

The textual content arrives three weeks after the Supreme Court issued a sentence that requires the restoring the traditional murals of the thirteenth century to the monastery of Sijena. The judicial choice collides with the technical incapacity declared by the MNAC to carry out these works with out deteriorating extra a cultural good thought of by a number of consultants as very fragile. A fee with technicians from the Generalitat, the Ministry of Culture, the Barcelona City Council – the three are patrons of the Museum -, along with one of many MNAC and two appointed by the Aragon authorities has been launched this week. But there have already been those that have denounced political interference, as is the case of former conservator Alberto Velasco, who has determined to resign from his place on the Lleida Museum as an indication of protest for the alleged efficiency of the Government of Salvador Illa by urgent to achieve an settlement with the Aragonese Executive.

The manifesto, entitled Heritage will not be a flagdoesn’t simply place themselves clearly concerning the comfort or not of transferring the works in litigation, though he claims to conform and respect the judicial features and likewise assumes that the switch should give ensures that he is not going to compromise its integrity. But he laments, even being a vital instrument within the building of collective identities, the use “for political purposes of cultural heritage, which becomes an occasional instrument to the service of spurious interests: grobing when it is convenient, almost always ignored.” In his opinion, Sijena’s work “is not a symbol or a flag that can be stirred as agreed, but a cultural good whose integrity must be preserved for the benefit of the whole society, given its patrimonial importance.” And attending to the precedents concerning the political curiosity in heritage, the signatories arrive to the conclusion that “this over -acting seems simply demagogic.”

Fernando Carrera, former director of the Superior School of Conservation and Restoration of Bens Culturais of Galicia, and Jorge Otero, Professor of Heritage Conservation on the University of Barcelona, ​​are behind the writing of the manifesto, clearly important of the continuing of politicians with reference to historic heritage. Therefore, they take into account that the controversy about Sijena’s work should “approach only from the technical and scientific plane” and that the intervention, which has “great uncertainties”, deserves “a serene and exquisite performance.” The textual content defends that the tactic utilized in 1936 to begin the work has to look with the eyes of that point and that its present state of affairs is a part of “of a historical process that increases its documentary value” and now rests within the MNAC, “where it is currently preserved in stable conditions.”

Solutions with calm

“We perceive that these dangers [de desmontaje, traslado y reposición] They have to be weighted fastidiously and that’s the reason we declare a relaxed debate, away from the present media strain, ”says the letter, which trusts a consensus resolution to the MNAC technicians and the Government of Aragon, so long as they will work“ with time and security required ”. They additionally belief the truth that certified professionals who may give“ without hesitation, without hesitation, are not appropriate.

One of the issues that remains in the air, say the signatory conservatives of the manifesto, is whether the technical solution output of consensus could “would be assumed and respected by all parties.” They reject any “coercion” towards professionals and insist on focusing the solution on “technical and ethical consensus and not to political interests.” They also recall the existence of an ethical code prepared by the European Confederation of Conservative-Restaurant Organizations (ECCO) that obliges “to put the integrity of cultural goods before any type of external pressure, whether political, institutional or economic”.

The manifesto is signed by specialists from a lot of the Spanish geography. He has additionally discovered the assist of three staff from the National Museum of Art of Catalonia.