Why is the 8 p.m. newspaper nonetheless thought-about a excessive mass | EUROtoday

On Jun 24, 2025

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

UDo not new paper on the head of the 8 p.m. Léa Salamé, as everybody is aware of now, will exchange Anne-Sophie Lapix to the presentation of the France 2 tv information. This announcement continues as we speak to stream plenty of ink. His relationship with Raphaël Glucksmann, a left -wing MEP, is identified. Its previous positions, particularly in We aren’t mendacity Or throughout political debates, resurfaces on social networks, questioning its journalistic “neutrality”.

If this choice arouses a lot stir, is it not proof that the information, which we regularly describe as in decline, stays this irreducible excessive mass of the start of the night and, most likely, a journalistic grail? David Medioni, co-director of the media observatory on the Jean-Jaurès Foundation, addresses all these questions in an interview with Point.

The level: France 2 struck an enormous blow by recruiting Léa Salamé?

David Medioni: Clearly, this switch is the media occasion of the 12 months. Léa Salamé, alongside Nicolas Demorand, has achieved exceptional work with the morning of France Inter. She was in a position to elevate this info assembly at an much more spectacular degree, when it was already very excessive when it arrived. Together, they broke information.

It is due to this fact an actual grasp stroke for France 2, as a result of Léa Salamé is a superb skilled, each within the discipline of data and leisure. This combination of expertise may convey an attention-grabbing dynamic to the Journal de France Télévisions. In my opinion, it’s a good decide!

Is it nonetheless a grail for journalists?

There stays a showcase of journalism, however it’s not the one reference. Today, being a journalist is as a lot to be Gilles Bouleau as Maxime Switek, Pascal Praud or Hugodécrypte. The information, nevertheless, retains a type of final incarnation. Otherwise, Léa Salamé would have accepted the Late present proposed by BFM. In France, the last word incarnation is the information, not the Late present.

Reproaching Léa Salamé for being influenced by her companion is a retrograde and reactionary imaginative and prescient.

This alternative for the information of France 2 can also be controversial. Some marvel about her political neutrality, she who shares her life with the left MEP Raphaël Glucksmann, to whom presidential needs.

Reproaching Léa Salamé for being influenced by her companion quantities to assuming that ladies are topic to their accomplice’s concepts, which is a retrograde and reactionary imaginative and prescient. Today, all the things is clear: everybody is aware of that she is the accomplice of Raphaël Glucksmann. This was not all the time the case up to now.

In addition, Léa Salamé has all the time been in a position to withdraw political interviews when mandatory, as through the European elections. Everything was organized at France Inter to ask Raphaël Glucksmann when Léa Salamé was not on the air, usually on Friday, due to this fact. Read too Anger to France Inter: why the arrival of Benjamin Duhamel is scandalous

Léa Salamé has robust convictions. She had the chance to defend them in We aren’t mendacity (between 2014 and 2016). Should a 20-hour presenter seem, with all the mandatory quotes, as a “neutral” character?

Unlike a program like We aren’t mendacitythe place everybody performed a properly -defined position – one on the left, the opposite on the best – the information will not be a task -playing sport. It is a way more institutional perform, the place the incarnation goes past the presenter’s character. The 20 -hour presenter’s chair essentially requires Léa Salamé to fade behind the perform, which requires sure codes. It is a perform which works past the person and which imposes a type of neutrality and illustration. A bit like a President of the Republic, the place it’s the standing that takes priority over the individual.

The 8 p.m. stays a key second for a part of the inhabitants: a benchmark, an info ritual that punctuates the day

Is the 8 p.m. nonetheless a second of gathering? The hearings are decrease than they have been …

JT hearings have clearly dropped. In 5 years, TF1, the historic chief, has misplaced round 1.5 million viewers, from greater than 6 million in 2020 to round 5 million as we speak. It is a gathering that crosses, dropping little by little from its solemnity and its gathering energy, in an more and more fragmented media panorama.

That mentioned, bringing collectively 5 million individuals every night at 8 p.m. stays a feat, particularly exterior main sporting occasions equivalent to World Cup finals or the Olympic Games. No different program succeeds. Admittedly, the information is not the viewers crossroads that it was within the Nineteen Nineties, with its 15 million viewers, but it surely stays a key second for a part of the inhabitants: a benchmark, an info ritual that punctuates the day.

To uncover

The kangaroo of the day

Answer

Who remains to be trying on the 20 -hour newspaper?

An getting older viewers. The common age of viewer is 57 years. This info format corresponds to rhythms and moments of life. I’m not certain that, tomorrow, the youthful generations will not take a look at the information in any respect. It has been twenty-five years that we clarify that the radio is useless, that TV is useless, that the information will disappear, that all the things will disappear. On the opposite, I think about that there’ll all the time be this urge for food for client info and that this field will stay an essential viewers crossroads.

https://www.lepoint.fr/debats/reunir-5-millions-de-personnes-chaque-soir-a-20-heures-reste-un-exploit-24-06-2025-2592774_2.php