Meta Wins Blockbuster AI Copyright Case—however There’s a Catch | EUROtoday
Meta scored a main victory in a copyright lawsuit on Wednesday when a federal decide dominated that the corporate didn’t violate the legislation when it skilled its AI instruments on 13 authors’ books with out permission.
“The Court has no choice but to grant summary judgment to Meta on the plaintiffs’ claim that the company violated copyright law by training its models with their books,” wrote US District Court Judge Vince Chhabria in a abstract judgment. He concluded that the plaintiffs didn’t current enough proof that Meta’s use of their books was dangerous.
In 2023, a high-profile group of authors, together with the comic Sarah Silverman, sued Meta, alleging that the tech behemoth had infringed on their copyright by coaching its giant language fashions on their work. Kadrey v. Meta was one of many first instances of its sort; now there are dozens of comparable AI copyright lawsuits winding by means of US courts.
Chhabria had beforehand burdened that he deliberate to look fastidiously at whether or not the plaintiffs had sufficient proof to point out that Meta’s use of their work would damage them financially. “The key question in virtually any case where a defendant has copied someone’s original work without permission is whether allowing people to engage in that sort of conduct would substantially diminish the market for the original,” he wrote within the judgment on Wednesday.
This is the second main ruling within the AI copyright world this week; on Monday, Judge William Alsup dominated that Anthropic’s use of copyrighted supplies to coach its personal AI instruments was authorized. Chhabria referenced Alsup’s abstract judgment in his choice.
Chhabria took pains to emphasize that his ruling was based mostly on the precise set of information on this case—leaving the door open for different authors to sue Meta for copyright infringement sooner or later. “In the grand scheme of things, the consequences of this ruling are limited. This is not a class action, so the ruling only affects the rights of these 13 authors—not the countless others whose works Meta used to train its models,” he wrote. “And, as should now be clear, this ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta’s use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful.”
This is a growing story. Please test again for updates.
https://www.wired.com/story/meta-scores-victory-ai-copyright-case/