Pascal Reddig in an interview about infrastructure expenditure | EUROtoday
The excessive new debt is a large burden for the younger technology. At the identical time, as members of the “young group”, we’re additionally conscious that we now have to speculate – each within the capacity to defend and within the infrastructure – if we wish to get Germany again on observe. But particularly with a view to the particular fund infrastructure, we made it clear from the beginning that we will solely take part if the cash can also be spent in a smart method. Means: not even larger social expenditure, as a substitute investments sooner or later, in infrastructure, in order that development impulses are additionally triggered in the long run.
Does the Creation Act, with which the five hundred billion heavy particular fund is to be created for infrastructure, fulfills your standards?
According to the earlier design that’s accessible, this isn’t the case. Therefore, the Current type just isn’t but in a position to consent.

They have spoken of social expenditure that shouldn’t be contested with the particular fund. How precisely do you concentrate on?
The institution legislation for the particular fund has to this point left an excessive amount of room for interpretation. We want clear pointers right here. Investments in infrastructure means: We put money into road, rail, future applied sciences, digitization and in vitality infrastructure. We rule out all the things else.
So the sports activities discipline just isn’t a part of the infrastructure.
The sports activities discipline not and the tablets in faculties are additionally not. It all is smart and has its justification, but when we would like one thing to vary, that the practice comes once more extra punctually, that you’ve got the impression that one thing modifications within the nation, the investments should be targeting sure areas. For all the things else, 100 billion euros can be found to the states and municipalities.
That doesn’t change the truth that a bunch of debt remains to be made. It is deliberate for an lively pension for seniors who can earn tax -free as much as 2000 euros per thirty days, however there aren’t any concepts for the younger technology but.
Unfortunately, the coalition settlement has its greatest weaknesses there, the place it’s about actual structural reforms. As a younger group within the Union faction, we additionally stated from the beginning: we principally take the particular fund with us, however provided that there are structural reforms in the identical breath. Now the finance minister has additionally warned family financial savings, however he has not but specified it. A concrete timetable is now wanted: How can we really wish to get proper reforms within the particular person areas – for instance on the query of how we finance our social safety methods sooner or later?
There is loads to return to the younger technology.
We have the pension system that’s on the expense of the younger technology as a result of we’ve missed reforms lately. We are speaking concerning the capacity to defend and defenses, the place necessary parts will definitely even be a part of navy service.
. . . that you simply welcome.
We assume that is proper as a result of, for instance, as a result of rising menace state of affairs by Russia – there isn’t a different manner. Added to that is the troublesome finances state of affairs. There usually are not but addressed the subject of local weather in all of those large areas – and we’ve not but addressed the subject of local weather – large stress for the younger technology. That is why politics want a transparent signal that you simply see this imbalance and that the necessity for reform is lastly involved. There should be the primary alerts in summer season. The incontrovertible fact that we preserve bloating up the family can’t be the answer.
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/junge-gruppe-in-der-union-pascal-reddig-im-interview-ueber-infrastrukturausgaben-110569338.html