The deputies reject the movement of socialist censure concentrating on François Bayrou | EUROtoday

The National Assembly postponed, Tuesday 1^er July, a movement of censorship of the federal government of François Bayrou, defended by the socialists, who criticize the Prime Minister for not committing to depositing in Parliament a textual content permitting to debate the authorized retirement age, set at 64 years because the reform undertaken by Elisabeth Borne.

Unsurprisingly, the reversal try – the eighth concentrating on the federal government of François Bayrou -, supported by the entire left, solely collected 189 votes out of the 289 vital, the nationwide rally having introduced that it could not vote it, and refer a potential censorship to the budgetary debates which is able to happen within the fall.

Socialists-who agreed with the federal government in January on non-censure on the state and social safety budget-criticize François Bayrou for having promised, in his preliminary letter, a dialogue between social companions “Without totem or taboo”and to have promised the “Last word in Parliament”earlier than closing the door to decreasing the authorized retirement age and the concept of ​​depositing a textual content comprising the age measurement in Parliament.

“By breaking your promise, you have chosen dishonor”launched the socialist Estelle Mercier from the gallery, in protection of the movement of censorship. “You have methodically emptied of its meaning” conclave “on pensions”added the deputy, associating this wonderful connoisseur of Henri IV within the determine of a “Ravaillac”who has “Handed up the list of [ses] commitments “.

In response, François Bayrou quipped the movement of censorship, a pretext, in keeping with him, for the Socialist Party remembers that he’s “In opposition”and invoked “Le Devoir” of “The general interest”,, “Stronger than all threats [de censure] »».

On pensions, the Prime Minister promised that there would be “A invoice” Using them ” progress “ From “conclave”, without specifying whether this text would be distinct from the draft social security budget, in which it has already planned to integrate certain points of consensus between unions and employers.