Starmer lastly bolsters Reeves after her tears within the Commons spook markets | EUROtoday
Sir Keir Starmer lastly moved to bolster Rachel Reeves on Wednesday after his chancellor wept by a tense PMQs session on dwell TV, spooking monetary markets and knocking the worth of the pound.
The prime minister stated Ms Reeves can be working the nation’s funds for “a very long time to come” after a Downing Street spokesman assured her job no less than till the subsequent basic election.
It got here as he floundered over the £5bn black gap left within the public funds by his profit cuts U-turn earlier than refusing to supply a visibly tearful Ms Reeves consolation – or reassurance she was secure. Pressure had been constructing on the PM to sack her as chancellor, alongside controversial chief of workers Morgan McSweeney, over the welfare debacle.
But the antagonistic response within the bond markets to her tears seems to have shored up Ms Reeves’ place. And, intertwining his destiny along with his chancellor’s, the prime minister stated: “She and I work together, we think together”.
Speaking on Wednesday night time to the BBC’s podcast Political Thinking with Nick Robinson, Sir Keir stated: “It’s got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what’s happened this week. It was a personal matter for her. I’m not going to intrude on her privacy by talking to you about that. It is a personal matter.”
Asked if Ms Reeves would stay in her publish, the prime minister stated: “She will be Chancellor by the time this is broadcast, she will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we’ve been working on to change the Labour party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the Chancellor and I’ve been working on together.”
A senior Labour determine stated the backbench revolt – and the last-minute concessions that hollowed out the welfare invoice – have been “terminal” for the prime minister’s political prospects. And there have been renewed calls from backbench Labour MPs for the occasion to pursue a wealth tax after the welfare fiasco.
And after the Institute for Fiscal Studies revealed that the watered-down welfare reforms would find yourself costing cash reasonably than saving billions as initially deliberate, the bond markets additionally turned uneasy.
Ms Reeves appeared emotional at PMQs as opposition chief Kemi Badenoch mocked her as wanting “absolutely miserable” and pressed Sir Keir on whether or not the chancellor’s job was even assured.
“Labour MPs are going on the record saying that the chancellor is toast,” the Conservative chief stated. “The reality is that she is a human shield for the prime minister’s incompetence. In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?”
Instead of confirming that Ms Reeves would keep, Sir Keir ignored the query and selected insult the Tory chief.
“I have to say that I am always cheered up when she asks me questions or responds to a statement, because she always makes a complete mess of it and shows just how unserious and irrelevant the Conservatives are,” he stated.
Ms Reeves’s sister Ellie, a Labour MP and a minister, appeared to carry the chancellor’s hand because the pair left the chamber.
Downing Street later insisted Ms Reeves has Sir Keir’s “full backing”, whereas a spokesperson stated Ms Reeves had been upset a couple of “personal matter”. Later nonetheless, it was claimed by ministers that Ms Reeves had been left in tears by an altercation with speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle, who had complained to her about her efficiency at Treasury questions on Tuesday. The Speaker’s Office declined to remark.
The prime minister stated on Wednesday night Ms Reeves was doing a “fantastic job”, including that it was “absolutely wrong” to recommend her tearful look within the Commons associated to the welfare U-turn.
Just two days in need of the primary anniversary of Labour’s landslide election victory, the shambolic scenes got here as stress mounted on Sir Keir to carry out a radical shift by sacking key figures and adopting wealth taxes.
Earlier, Labour backbench insurgent chief Rachael Maskell had demanded that the prime minister “listen to MPs” and others within the wake of the bruising welfare debate. She insisted that Sir Keir and his chancellor now have to “consider a wealth tax” to fill the £5bn monetary black gap left by the advantages concessions.
The proposal has robust cupboard assist, with a memo leaked final month displaying that deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, now being mentioned as a alternative for Sir Keir, had instructed that eight completely different wealth taxes be levied on large firms and the super-rich instead of the cuts.
The Trades Union Congress – which incorporates Labour’s greatest monetary backers – can be working a lobbying marketing campaign with MPs to push for a change in course.
Concern within the City over the prospect of extra tax rises was highlighted by Gordon Shannon, a fund supervisor at TwentyFour Asset Management, who warned: “Gilt investors wanted to see spending cuts. Now the government’s only exit is tax rises, risking a death spiral of growth destruction.”
The worth of the pound and gilts dropped as Sir Keir spoke within the Commons, whereas yields on authorities bonds rose – that means larger borrowing prices.
Kathleen Brooks, analysis director at XTB, stated: “If yields continue to rise at this pace for the next few days, the PM and chancellor will have to decide if they want to have a sensible fiscal policy whereby public sector debt is reined in, or whether they want to please the Labour back benches, who don’t seem worried by rising debt levels and forget that we are in a new era, where bond investors can shun sovereign debt in favour of less risky, less indebted corporate debt.
“Overall, this could be the start of another fiscal crisis for the UK.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rachel-reeves-tears-keir-starmer-welfare-rebellion-b2781336.html