Dubious gross sales ways at two main property companies uncovered by BBC investigation | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Lucy Vallance and Sarah Bell

BBC Panorama

BBC Headshot of Julie, standing outside in front of a pale brick wall. She has straight shoulder-length blonde hair with a fringe and has clear-framed glasses. She is wearing a white v-neck t-shirt and a pearl necklace. BBC

Julie Gallagher bought her home by Connells’ Abingdon workplace, the place Panorama went undercover

“She’s probably done me out of quite a bit of money – I feel angry and conned.”

Julie Gallagher believes her dwelling was bought at a lower cost than it might have gone for. There was a purchaser who may need provided extra for it, an undercover investigation by BBC Panorama can reveal.

Her Connells property agent appeared to sideline this potential purchaser in favour of another person who had agreed to take out an in-house mortgage.

That mortgage was stated to be value about £2,000 to Connells, whereas the corporate probably stood to make £10,000 in complete by arranging add-on companies and promoting the customer’s property too.

“She sat on this sofa… and said she was actually working for me and she obviously is not, she’s working for the company’s ends,” says Julie. “How dare Connells do that? Just appalling.”

Panorama determined to research the corporate after chatting with greater than 20 unbiased monetary advisers (IFAs) and mortgage advisers from throughout England and Wales who had issues about how the corporate operated.

One of the largest property companies within the UK, Connells runs 80 chains with greater than 1,200 branches. Our undercover reporter, Lucy Vallance, obtained a job in Abingdon, Oxfordshire, in an own-brand workplace.

Watch: Connells’ workplace administrator tells BBC undercover reporter “just a sale is not good enough”

During her six weeks there in February, she discovered proof that the senior department supervisor favoured potential patrons, in the event that they had been planning to take out Connells in-house companies, like conveyancing or mortgages, as a result of it made extra money for the corporate.

Connells informed us it’s “committed to treating all customers and prospective buyers fairly.”

Panorama additionally investigated the web property company Purplebricks, after we heard issues it had been making an attempt to draw sellers by overvaluing properties.

Once a buyer was signed up, workers then tried to persuade them to chop the asking worth, incomes fee if profitable – a former gross sales negotiator informed us. The whistleblower, who labored for the corporate between June and October 2024, additionally filmed on-line conferences for Panorama.

Purplebricks informed us worth reductions had been as soon as a goal for rewarding workers, however that’s not the case, and it doesn’t overvalue properties to win directions.

‘Hot patrons’

In Abingdon, the undercover reporter discovered that making an attempt to rearrange mortgages may very well be as vital as promoting homes – and that Connells’ workers felt below stress to get individuals signed up.

Connells, like many different property companies, has an in-house mortgage-brokering workforce.

The unbiased monetary advisers we have now spoken to – who compete for patrons with property brokers’ in-house companies – say this stress can result in some brokers within the business taking part in quick and free with the principles.

One observe referred to as “conditional selling” is forbidden by the Code of Practice for Residential Estate Agents, of which many firms throughout England, Wales, and Northern Ireland – together with Connells – are signatories.

This is when an property agent suggests, implies or tells you that you have to prepare issues like mortgages or conveyancing companies by their in-house groups – or there will probably be damaging penalties for a deal.

It means property brokers signed as much as the code know they need to not discriminate towards potential patrons who do not use their in-house companies.

Connells’ senior department supervisor informed our reporter, at one level, that she understood conditional promoting was not allowed.

But that wasn’t the total image.

Estate brokers are speculated to work in one of the best pursuits of their shoppers, however we noticed how stress for revenue formed choices at Connells in Abingdon.

One Saturday, our reporter was requested to host an open-house viewing for Julie’s four-bedroom home, which was in the marketplace for presents over £300,000. It attracted nice curiosity. Fifteen individuals attended and others additionally wished to guide separate viewings.

But the next Monday, the senior department supervisor appeared concerned about two doable patrons – these chatting with Connells’ in-house brokers. The subsequent day, by way of WhatsApp, she informed her workers to not prepare any extra viewings on Julie’s home.

One signed as much as a Connells-brokered mortgage. The senior department supervisor referred to as individuals who had agreed to take out mortgages and different companies by the corporate, sizzling patrons.

A board within the workplace titled “Hot Buyers” had the names of home hunters on the department who had agreed to take out a mortgage or a conveyancing bundle by Connells.

The sizzling purchaser for Julie’s home made an preliminary provide, which she rejected, however ultimately upped it to efficiently safe the property.

There was one other potential purchaser concerned about the home who appeared to have deeper pockets – a money purchaser. She wasn’t taking out a mortgage by the corporate.

Connells informed us they spoke to the money purchaser the Monday after the open home and that she was undecided about placing in a proposal. A name from the money purchaser later the identical day was missed, stated the corporate, and never adopted up.

When the undercover reporter informed the workplace administrator in regards to the money purchaser, who she heard later may need provided extra, the reporter was informed that “just a sale” was “not good enough” for Connells.

“They will probably more likely aim to get somebody who’s signed up with us and wants to use our conveyancing, as opposed to someone who is a cash buyer,” stated the administrator. “That’s just how Connells are. That’s why they ride you if you don’t have enough mortgage appointments.”

Picture of Julie's house taken from the back garden. It is a 1980s semi-detached home with sliding patio doors. She is standing to the right hand side of the doors. It is a sunny day.

Connells’ senior department supervisor has “taken options out of my hands and probably done me out of quite a bit of money”, says Julie Gallagher

Lisa Webb, shopper regulation knowledgeable with Which? Magazine, reviewed Panorama’s proof of how this sale was managed.

“This is absolutely something that should be against the law – and something that I think that these estate agents really ought to be investigated by the authorities for, because this should not be happening,” she informed us.

The undercover reporter secretly filmed her boss – the senior department supervisor – saying why she was so eager on the recent purchaser. Not solely wouldn’t it imply accumulating charges from the vendor, the supervisor defined, but additionally fee from the in-house mortgage with conveyancing charges on high.

In addition, Connells would attempt to promote the recent purchaser’s outdated home – and earn extra charges.

The senior department supervisor stated the mixed deal might, in complete, be value £10,000 to the corporate.

“That, in itself, is just appalling behaviour,” stated Lisa Webb from Which? after we confirmed her the footage.

Connells for sale sign - written in white letters on a red background - attached to a wooden fence. A house with white wooden cladding can be seen in the background.

Connells says “no harm has been caused” to the client

According to the 1979 Estate Agents Act it’s classed as an “undesirable practice” for property brokers to discriminate towards potential patrons if they do not take out a mortgage by in-house brokers.

If they do that, they are often investigated by Trading Standards. But it seems to be like the principles could not cowl the sidelining of potential patrons as seen by Panorama’s undercover reporter.

Those guidelines have to be up to date, in accordance with monetary journalist Iona Bain.

“There’s clearly a grey area here, whereby estate agents are able to accept one buyer that will use the in-house broker and turn everybody else away,” she informed us.

Homeowner Julie, who has now packed up and left her home forward of the sale going by, was horrified after we informed her what had occurred.

“I’m quite appalled really that… she [senior branch manager] has kind of taken options out of my hands and probably done me out of quite a bit of money, really.”

  • If you will have extra details about this story, you’ll be able to attain Panorama immediately by electronic mail – panorama.reply@bbc.co.uk

Connells stated it rejects “any accusation of conditional selling” and that “no harm has been caused” to the client. There had been different presents on Julie’s property, it informed us, however the accepted provide was the very best.

“It is not the case that customers who use our mortgage services are more likely to successfully purchase a property than those who do not,” it added. It stated that within the six-week interval Panorama was undercover, solely two properties out of 14 went to prospects utilizing the in-house mortgage service.

It additionally stated it invests “significant time and resources in training our teams to ensure they understand the laws, regulations and guidelines within which they must operate”.

“Any employee found to be in breach of these standards faces strict disciplinary action, including dismissal,” Connells stated.

The senior department supervisor informed Panorama she was content material for Connells to reply on her behalf.

‘Overvaluing properties massively’

At Purplebricks, a whistleblower started secretly filming conferences as a result of she says she grew to become pissed off with how the corporate was being run.

Firstly on her cellphone, then with a digicam offered by Panorama.

The largest shock for the whistleblower was studying that workers had been being incentivised to get worth reductions on properties – lots of which, she was informed by one of many firm’s native property brokers, appeared to have been put in the marketplace for greater than they had been value.

“We are overvaluing properties massively just to gain instructions,” stated the agent to the whistleblower in a non-public message.

Estate brokers usually use property valuations to draw prospects – and subsequently dropping the asking worth shouldn’t be uncommon. The property brokers’ code tells firms they “must never deliberately misrepresent the market value of a property”.

Still taken from an advert, showing a woman standing on a suburban pavement in front of 1930s homes. There are Purplebricks for sale signs in front of three houses. She is wearing a pink suit and has her thumb up.

Purplebricks has adverts, like this one, which say prospects can promote their properties totally free

The whistleblower was additionally informed in the identical message from the agent that workers might earn fee in the event that they persuaded sellers to drop their asking costs.

The similar agent instructed to her that 18 worth drops per thirty days might earn workers £900 in fee.

In a web based assembly, the whistleblower’s workforce chief informed workers strategy conversations with sellers about worth drops.

He stated, when properties go dwell, sellers could be informed that if there aren’t many viewings or presents throughout the first 4 weeks then they need to “have a conversation about [price] reduction”.

“So they won’t necessarily push the reduction there and then, but they will plant the seed,” he added.

Purplebricks informed us it does not overvalue properties and that whereas worth reductions had been as soon as a goal for rewarding workers, that was not the case. It stated it does not declare to be excellent and apologises wherever it has fallen brief.

Picture of the Purple Bricks whistleblower taken from behind. She is sitting a a wooden desk with a laptop, in front of a large window which has metal blinds. She has shoulder-length straight grey hair.

The Purplebricks whistleblower recorded on-line conferences for Panorama

Purplebricks workers had been additionally below stress to promote monetary merchandise like mortgages and conveyancing, the whistleblower informed us.

During the time she labored there, she stated the corporate inspired prospects to get their conveyancing achieved by firms it had offers with, quite than look elsewhere.

“We don’t want them to get a quote for comparison because we are by far and away very expensive,” stated her workforce chief throughout a web based assembly.

When Ryan Evans and Olivia Phelps purchased a two-bedroom home in Sutton-in-Ashfield by Purplebricks they ended up shopping for conveyancing companies by the corporate.

Olivia and Ryan pictured sitting next to each other, from a slight sideways angle, on a sofa in a living room. Olivia is slightly out of focus in the foreground, she has long, dark hair tied back, and a tight-fitting pink top. She is wearing glasses. Ryan has short fair hair with a fringe, black-rimmed glasses and is wearing a red-T-shirt.

Ryan Evans informed us he felt Purplebricks “had taken advantage of us a bit because we were first-time buyers”

They paid £2,820 final summer time. Using worth comparability web sites, Panorama discovered that was almost thrice greater than the present least expensive quote for a similar property.

“We were none the wiser having never done all this before. I certainly felt like maybe they [Purplebricks] had taken advantage of us a bit because we were first-time buyers,” Ryan informed us.

Like Connells, Purplebricks can also be signed as much as the Code of Practice for Residential Estate Agents which says: “You should provide a service to both buyers and sellers consistent with fairness, integrity and best practice.”

Our whistleblower additionally recorded her workforce chief firing-up workers to promote add-on merchandise along with conveyancing.

“So let’s try and really squeeze every lead for as much as it’s got – and I want us to be a bit more relentless,” he informed workers at one assembly. “The urgency is massive… there is still a heinous amount of money to be made.”

Anyone working in gross sales is inspired to promote extra, says Lisa Webb of Which?, however it’s “a real issue” if an property agent is “incentivising someone to make a very quick decision” or pressuring them “into making decisions too quickly… before they’ve had the option to shop around”.

Purplebricks stated it solely rejects any portrayal of its service as pressure-selling, including that it doesn’t promote hard-selling and that it focuses on the advantages, not worth, when recommending companies.

In an announcement, it additionally stated that since new homeowners took over in 2023, it has “worked hard to improve service and build a team and culture that puts customers first”.

The whistleblower’s workforce chief didn’t need to remark and informed us he had left Purplebricks.

A thin, grey banner promoting the News Daily newsletter. On the right, there is a graphic of an orange sphere with two concentric crescent shapes around it in a red-orange gradient, like a sound wave. The banner reads: "The latest news in your inbox first thing.”

Get our flagship e-newsletter with all of the headlines it is advisable to begin the day. Sign up right here.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg81l57x53o