Last hour of the trial towards former president Álvaro Uribe, dwell | The decide resumes the listening to and ensures that it’s “crazy” that Uribe didn’t know concerning the witnesses to the witnesses | EUROtoday

The decide continues together with her arguments to assist the credibility of the proof and witnesses

Two and a half hours after beginning the listening to, Judge Sandra Heredia continues to learn a ruling that, to date, helps the credibility of all proof and witnesses towards former president Álvaro Uribe. He has acknowledged the validity of two key exams of 2018: phone interceptions that the Supreme Court made by mistake the ex -president, and the recordings with a spy clock made by the witness Juan Guillermo Monsalve when the then lawyer of Uribe, Diego Cadena, visited him in jail.

The decide has a number of occasions the actions of Monsalve, the paramilitary who accused Uribe of hyperlinks with paramilitarism after which recorded the alleged pressures suffered by the previous president’s lawyer. “He had the civil value, not only to hold his speech, but to document it,” he defined. “There is no evidence of animosity against the defendant,” he emphasised.

Heredia recalled the context of hostility that Monsalve has confronted for his statements, each throughout the jail by which he was held. “That need to protect its version led to the fact that it had unconventional mechanisms, such as violating prison security with a spy watch,” he stated. For the decide, Monsalve “was not the most eloquent” in her interventions and appeared “shy”, however that’s comprehensible by its context: “It is not free, to the extent that it faces consanguinees.”