Trump Administration Finds Money For Troops, Says It’s Too ‘Difficult’ To Pay Food Benefits | EUROtoday

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration has discovered inventive methods to cowl army pay through the ongoing authorities shutdown, however says it could’t do the identical for federal meals advantages.

Justice Department attorneys instructed a federal courtroom this week that although there are piles of cash it might use for meals help, it might be too dangerous to take action for November’s advantages.

In response to a lawsuit from Democratic-led states demanding the continuation of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funds, the Justice Department stated doing so with emergency funds “would be both legally dubious and practically disastrous.”

The authorities has been shut down because the starting of the month as Democrats demand Republicans conform to an extension of expiring tax credit that assist greater than 20 million Americans afford medical insurance.

During the final shutdown, in 2019, the Trump administration made additional effort to distribute SNAP advantages as a funding standoff entered its second month. In a putting reversal, the Trump administration now says its arms are tied. As a consequence, subsequent month, greater than 20 million households representing 42 million folks will miss out on SNAP advantages averaging about $350 per family.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees the diet program, has insisted it could’t pay the advantages regardless of the presence of $5.25 billion in a contingency fund — sufficient to cowl a portion of the roughly $8 billion allotment that will begin going out on Saturday.

The USDA “maintains the long-term emergency fund for disasters that may arise, rather than expending them all at once on partial payments and hoping that no emergency will require their use over the coming years,” the administration’s attorneys instructed a federal courtroom in Massachusetts, the place the Democrats lodged their criticism.

The administration additionally stated it might be “exceedingly difficult” to ship out partial advantages, one thing it claimed has by no means been carried out earlier than.

“Any attempt to calculate and implement a nationwide reduction would long delay this round of benefits, any round of benefits restoring beneficiaries to the full amount for November, and a future round of benefits returning to the standard calculation,” the Trump administration stated in its submitting late Wednesday evening.

(In 2013, the USDA carried out an across-the-board discount in SNAP advantages with none technical issues coming to public consideration.)

The White House instructed Axios this week it tapped three completely different accounts as a way to cowl the $5.3 million wanted for army paychecks due Friday. One finances professional has argued the administration’s earlier strikes to cowl solider salaries weren’t strictly authorized. The additional effort to seek out cash for service members comes as Trump sends the National Guard to quell doubtful crime emergencies in cities throughout the nation, and because the Pentagon prepares a brand new “quick reaction force” for future home deployments.

The coming lapse of SNAP advantages might be essentially the most extreme impression but of the federal government shutdown, which seems more likely to change into the longest considered one of all time, and Republicans in Congress are adamant it’s completely Democrats’ fault for refusing to vote for his or her funding invoice.

“As there are millions of Americans this morning that are bracing themselves for further pain and hardship,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) stated Thursday, “the Democrats, incredibly, are showing no signs at all that they want to end their shutdown.”

HuffPost requested Johnson why the Trump administration shouldn’t do what it did in Trump’s first time period, when it paid SNAP advantages a number of weeks early in case the shutdown dragged right into a second month.

“Well, the president, his administration, has done exactly what he did in the first term, and that is bend over backwards to make sure that we mitigate the harm,” Johnson stated, incorrectly.

Regarding the early advantages in 2019, the Justice Department famous in its transient that the Government Accountability Office stated the early dispersal was illegal, but in addition portrayed it as a profitable gambit that’s simply now not obtainable.

“In January 2019, though there were insufficient long-term emergency fund moneys available, USDA was able to structure ‘early issuance’ of benefits and the lapse ended before any shortfall in funds required drawing down the long-term emergency fund,” the administration’s attorneys stated.

David Super, an professional on administrative regulation at Georgetown University Law School, questioned the administration’s resolution to to not faucet its contingency fund.

“USDA said that it would prefer to hold money in reserve to help victims of any future natural disasters,” Super instructed HuffPost in an e mail. “That is a strange preference when withholding SNAP’s contingency reserves means that 42 million real people will face immediate crises obtaining food.”

In response to the approaching meals cliff, Democrats have elevated the variety of press conferences they’re holding this week and launched standalone payments to maintain the SNAP cash flowing, solely to see the laws blocked or ignored by Republicans.

Johnson stated opening the federal government piecemeal, akin to by funding the USDA for the distribution of meals advantages, would weaken Republicans’ leverage over Democrats.

“If you do just part of this, it will reduce the pressure for them to do all of it, to do their basic job, and that is reopen the government,” Johnson instructed CNN.

One GOP lawmaker, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), launched a SNAP invoice of his personal, but it surely seems unlikely Republican leaders will enable it to get a vote within the Senate. Hawley stated he didn’t help the administration sending out SNAP advantages in any other case.

“I honestly don’t know legally if you can or not. They think they can’t,” Hawley instructed HuffPost. “But the bottom line is that even if he could, I don’t think he has enough at his disposal to fund SNAP fully.”

Igor Bobic contributed reporting.