Louis Sarkozy’s controversial outing on street security annoys associations | EUROtoday
Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.
FShould he take away pink lights and visitors indicators? Louis Sarkozy has his personal concepts on the matter. The candidate for mayor of Menton offered his program on Highway Code this Wednesday, December 3, whereas a latest research by the Vinci Autoroutes Foundation signifies that 95% of street customers worry the dangerous habits of others. According to him, “what kills motorists is assistance”, and we should “give back to the citizen full responsibility for his conduct, instead of him delegating it entirely to the Highway Code”. Remarks that increase multiple eyebrow.
On the menu: “no sidewalk, no red light, no white line”, in order that “everyone (pays) more attention”. Because for Nicolas Sarkozy’s son, the abolition of street indicators makes motorists extra accountable. According to him, such measures, grouped underneath the identify “naked roads”, permit “citizens” to take duty: “then what researchers call an “implicit negotiation” between customers takes place. They turn into two, thrice extra cautious […] When you empower folks, they naturally turn into slower, extra attentive… and extra beneficiant to one another […] Individuals are one of the best guarantors of their very own security,” assures the son of the previous President of the Republic.
For Pierre Chasseray, common delegate of 40 Millions d’automobilistes, this declaration is a “way out of line”: “Already, I don’t think that this is the priority of motorists today. Then, this type of thinking worries me, it’s a caricature. » Joined by The Pointthe person who is also spokesperson for the association recalls that there are in fact “countries where there are relatively few road signs and where compliance with the Highway Code is even very random: their deaths on the road number in the hundreds, even thousands. » If he “hears” case by case, “questioning road signs is populism and demagoguery”.
“Without signage, we don’t know there is a danger”
Recognizing that this mannequin works “less well for visually impaired or very elderly people”, Louis Sarkozy for his half pleads for “this to be implemented in France, at least in trial areas. Let’s start small and see what happens.” He takes the instance of Drachten, a city within the Netherlands the place such measures have been adopted and the place, in response to him, “a 40% reduction in road accidents has been observed. The main intersection went from eight serious accidents per year to just one.” He cites different examples in his RMC editorial, equivalent to that of Kensington High Street, the place the simplification of signaling has led, in response to him, to a 44% discount in accidents in three years.
To Discover
Kangaroo of the day
Answer
Pierre Chasseray recollects that, though these encouraging figures can coexist with the adoption of such measures, this doesn’t imply that they’re the consequence: “At the moment, for example, the price of a baguette is increasing, as is, unfortunately, the number of road deaths. This does not mean that there is a cause and effect link between the two! »
He also recalls that 40 Million motorists have a “pragmatic” place with reference to street indicators: “Without hazard indicators, we have no idea that there’s a hazard. Road indicators, high quality street markings, security guidelines, all of that is important. » And underline: “Besides, if we solely put precedence methods, when does the pedestrian cross? The street is shared. And if the street is shared, there’s a want for signage to implement security guidelines. »
https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/c-est-du-populisme-la-sortie-polemique-de-louis-sarkozy-sur-la-securite-routiere-agace-les-associations-03-12-2025-2604656_23.php