Lispector Constellation | Culture | THE COUNTRY | EUROtoday

It fascinates me Derivesdiary of Kate Zambreno (Illinois, 48 ​​years previous) as carefully linked to the vitality of the day as to the time that escapes us. And it fascinates me a lot that I find yourself trapped by this fragment: “I have at most fifteen minutes to write this passage. It will not be high literature. It will announce, perhaps, that I have existed today.”

It is gorgeous: what we’re writing might someday present proof that, simply once we wrote it, we existed. I might say that the fragment is a part of a “non-fiction” of recent works. Or hasn’t Annie Ernaux stated that Zambreno in Derives has invented “a new way of writing about real life”?

I imagine her. I’ve investigated. It is a brand new manner of writing about actual life that connects Zambreno with authors of comparable vibe: Anne Carson, Jenny Offill, María Negroni, Valeria Luiselli, Heike Geissle… It is a constellation that practices the escape from official “nonfiction” and of which the ill-fated Clarice Lispector can be the parable and the star.

I flip to synthetic intelligence to see if it has information of this surprising (nevertheless refreshing) schismatic development inside the more and more pregnant world of “non-fiction.” And in his response he talks to me about liquid journalism and platforms like TikTok. I’m simply asking you to assume once more about your reply. And then a shocking modification emerges from it: “The Lispector Constellation, which brings together valuable authors whose life resembles art and art resembles their life, has gained definitive recognition in 2025 by consolidating itself as an alternative to the damaged prestige of so many narratives based on real events. It is a trend that not only uses personal life as material, but also fragments it and elevates it through thought.”

With this flight of authors confirmed by the AI ​​and likewise the existence of larger zeal in literary expeditions in direction of the reality, I dare to ask you what the idea of “complete overwriting of the self”, dealt with by the authors of the Constellation, suggests to you. But I hit bone. And in its contrite response, the AI ​​makes use of a really well mannered however sophisticated speech to apologize for not having sufficient information to develop its info.

I simply needed to search out out, I apologize, when you do not imagine that from the e book Derivesby Kate Zambreno, the “energy of the everyday” emerges via a sequence of day by day trivia. I belief that the phrase “minutia” will activate your reminiscence and lead you to cite Lichtenberg (“The human tendency to be interested in minutiae has led to great things”), however what follows is a profound silence that reveals a manufacturing unit defect: AI doesn’t have the slightest capability to affiliate concepts, photographs, life recollections.

I want you content holidays and I thanks immensely for giving credit score to the real-life existence of the Lispector Constellation. Two seconds of ready, and comes his well mannered response: “You’re welcome. Just think that you always hit the nail on the head, regardless of where you hit the hammer.”