Oklahoma removes teacher who gave failing grade to school scholar’s essay and sparked conservative outrage | EUROtoday

The University of Oklahoma has eliminated a educating assistant who gave a scholar an F grade on a psychology paper which sparked outrage from conservatives and prompted claims of spiritual discrimination.

“Based on an examination of the graduate teaching assistant’s prior grading standards and patterns, as well as the graduate teaching assistant’s own statements related to this matter, it was determined that the graduate teaching assistant was arbitrary in the grading of this specific paper,” the University mentioned in a Monday assertion.

“The graduate teaching assistant will no longer have instructional duties at the University.”

It comes after Samantha Fulnecky, a junior on the college, reported her psychology teacher Mel Curth after receiving the grade and claimed she acquired zero factors out of 25 “for my beliefs and using freedom of speech, and especially for my religious beliefs.”

The assignment was to write a 650-word essay reacting to a psychology article about the effect of gender norms on middle school students and their impact on mental health.

open image in gallery

open image in gallery

Fulnecky’s complaint was promoted by the university’s chapter of Turning Point USA, a conservative nonprofit founded by Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated in September. The group posted Fulnecky’s essay and Curth’s response online and blasted the educator, who uses she/they pronouns, writing: “We should not be letting mentally ill professors around students.”

That submit drew fast reactions on-line with individuals taking sides – some defending the professor and calling the paper ‘poor.’ While others defended Fulnecky.

In Curth’s suggestions, Curth had mentioned Fulnecky was entitled to her personal beliefs, however that the psychology article was based mostly on years of psychological analysis and proof, not simply society “pushing lies.”

In its Monday assertion, the college mentioned that Fulnecky’s two claims, one interesting the grade and the opposite formally complaining of “illegal religious discrimination,” had been resolved.

“As already announced, the grade appeal was decided in favor of the student, removing the assignment completely from the student’s total point value of the class, resulting in no academic harm to the student,” UO mentioned. “The claim for discrimination has been investigated and concluded. The University does not release findings from such investigations.”

The college added the provost, the University’s highest rating educational officer and the educational dean, reviewed the total information of the matter, earlier than their choice.

“The University of Oklahoma believes strongly in both its faculty’s rights to teach with academic freedom and integrity and its students’ right to receive an education that is free from a lecturer’s impermissible evaluative standards,” the assertion learn.

open image in gallery

“We are committed to teaching students how to think, not what to think. The University will continue to review best practices to ensure that its instructors have the comprehensive training necessary to objectively assess their students’ work without limiting their ability to teach, inspire, and elevate our next generation.”

In her authentic essay, Fulnecky repeatedly cited the Bible and emphasised her proper to free speech, stating she believes “eliminating gender in our society would be detrimental, as it pulls us farther from God’s original plan for humans.”

“Society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders and everyone should be whatever they want to be is demonic and severely harms American youth,” she wrote.

However, many on-line agreed with Curth’s evaluation of the essay, criticizing her writing capacity, lack of sources and digression from the directions. “Her paper was absolutely embarrassing. She failed to follow directions, didn’t meet the word count and didn’t cite a single source,” one consumer wrote on X.

Another teacher for the course, Megan Waldron, mentioned she concurred with Curth’s F grade, saying Fulnecky’s essay “should not be considered as a completion of the assignment.”

The Independent has contacted the University of Oklahoma for additional touch upon Curth’s dismissal as an teacher.