Yaël Braun-Pivet “regrets” that the Assembly can’t “completely examine” the textual content | EUROtoday

The President of the National Assembly, Yaël Braun-Pivet, regretted on Sunday January 18 that the National Assembly couldn’t “get to the bottom of the budget review”calling for “change the procedure” with out wanting to present desire between 49.3 and the ordinance to shorten the debates.

As the budgetary marathon in Parliament approaches its epilogue, MP Renaissance des Yvelines pleaded for the draft state finances for 2026 “be the last one discussed in this way”on RTL and Public Senate.

“Rules do not help the emergence of compromise. And that is problematic. When there is political will that is prevented by procedure, the procedure must be changed”she stated.

The President of the Assembly stated “regret” that the debates can’t come to an finish, whereas the federal government ended the debates on the Palais-Bourbon on Thursday night and the Prime Minister, Sébastien Lecornu, famous in latest days the impossibility of getting the finances adopted by a vote, as a result of lack of majority. “When you do politics, you have to keep the commitments you make”she slipped, grateful ” share “ the failure of the tactic of the Prime Minister, who had promised to not use article 49.3.

A democratic failure

Sébastien Lecornu should now select between 49.3, which permits him to undertake and not using a vote a textual content modified by amendments of his selection offered he resists censorship, or budgetary orders, an unprecedented gadget which requires the implementation of the preliminary venture.

M^me Braun-Pivet didn’t want to say what his desire could be: “These are two constitutional tools in the hand of the government (…) It’s not up to me to choose.”she swept away. “What I prefer and what I want is for France to have a budget. »

The MP has promised in recent months to try to modify the procedure for examining budgets by next year, regretting the growing number of amendments and the organization of parliamentary debate, which require discussing first revenues, then state expenditure.

“We only talked about taxes, only additional revenue, only taxes”and never sufficient “of what primarily interests the French”as “justice, national education, environmental issues”she listed. “We can clearly see that democratically, things are not going well”she obtained aggravated.