Powell, president of the Fed: “If independence is lost, it would be difficult to restore the credibility of the institution” | Economy | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

The finest requirement {that a} central banker can meet is predictability. Jerome Powell, the chairman of the United States Federal Reserve, likes to stay to the script in order to not upset investor confidence. So as anticipated, the Fed determined this Wednesday to maintain rates of interest intact in a spread between 3.5% and three.75% after three consecutive cuts on the finish of final 12 months. This is the primary Fed assembly since Powell denounced 10 days in the past {that a} prison investigation had been opened in opposition to him for opposing the White House’s makes an attempt at interference.

In the midst of the storm over the independence of the central financial institution, Powell left, throughout his look earlier than the press, a mirrored image for the historical past books: “The objective of (the Fed’s) independence is not to protect particular interests or anything like that. It is an institutional agreement that has benefited the population, by establishing a separation, by avoiding direct financial control by elected officials over the setting of monetary policy.”

This 72-year-old lawyer, who was criticized by his colleagues as a result of he didn’t have a doctorate in economics like his predecessors, is doing extra to defend the autonomy of the establishment than many others in earlier a long time. “I think that if that independence is lost, first of all, it would be difficult to restore the credibility of the institution. If people lose trust that we make decisions based solely on our evaluation of what is best for everyone, for the general public, instead of trying to benefit one group or another, if that trust is lost, it will be difficult to regain it,” he mentioned.

Despite latest assaults from the White House to raid the Fed, Powell has been optimistic. “And we haven’t lost it (independence). I don’t think we will. I certainly hope not, but it’s very important. The reason it’s important is that it has allowed central banks, in general, not to be perfect, but to serve the public well.”

-Do you belief that you would be able to preserve that independence at this second?, the journalists ask you.

– “Yes. I am firmly committed to it, as are my colleagues,” Powell responded.

The considerations of Fed central bankers have prolonged past their two mandates: worth stability and job creation. Without main shocks of their aims, with a weak however steady labor market, and inflation caught at round 2.8%, the bankers have most well-liked to attend to see how the tariffs and the large fiscal stimulus that Trump permitted by means of his administration evolve. Big and Beautiful Lawto. Thus, Donald Trump’s livid assaults in opposition to the independence of the establishment and tensions over the US greenback have featured within the conversations.

“Today I simply refer to the statement I made on January 11. I am not going to expand on it or repeat it. I am simply not going to do it; this is a press conference about the economy and what we did today,” Powell remarked when journalists requested him concerning the pending prison investigation.

Investors have been hoping to listen to the central banker’s first public feedback following his Jan. 11 criticism, which is the topic of a pursuit by the Justice Department, however they obtained no additional reflections from the Washington-born lawyer. That day, Powell revealed a video wherein he revealed that he was the topic of a prison investigation by the District of Columbia prosecutor’s workplace for the price overruns of the reform of the Fed headquarters in Washington. In an uncommon intervention, he didn’t hesitate responsible the harassment of the White House to regulate the establishment. “The threat of criminal charges is because the Federal Reserve sets interest rates based on our best assessment of what will benefit the general interest, rather than following the president’s preferences,” he mentioned in a video posted on the Federal Reserve’s account on X. Trump is pushing for the Fed to decrease charges extra aggressively. He believes that this can stimulate the financial system forward of the midterm elections to be held on the finish of this 12 months.

After months of patiently enduring the insults and threats from the occupant of the Oval Office, Powell rebelled. In the next days he acquired help from central bankers from different international locations, the three residing former chairmen of the Federal Reserve, economists and traders. Despite the truth that help for the 72-year-old banker, born in Washington, was nearly unanimous. Trump maintained his marketing campaign: “He is incompetent or corrupt,” he mentioned two days after the courtroom summons was introduced.

“I do not respond to the comments of other officials, whoever they are. It is simply not appropriate to do so,” he insisted when requested concerning the resolution of the Supreme Court, which has to determine whether or not to simply accept the dismissal of Lisa Cook, one of many governors of the Fed. “I will tell you why I attended (the public hearing to hear the parties’ arguments). I would say that this case is perhaps the most important legal case in the 113-year history of the Federal Reserve, and when I reflected on it, I thought it would be difficult to explain “Why did not I attend?” he added. “Also, Paul Volcker attended a Supreme Court case, a identified truth, round 1985, so there’s a precedent. I assumed it was applicable, and I did it,” he concluded.

The White House’s desperate attempts to raid the Fed have also affected Lisa Cook, another of the FOMC member governors. They accuse her of irregularities when applying for two mortgages to supposedly benefit from better financial conditions. The Trump Administration has tried, unsuccessfully, to fire her, but the courts have prevented it. Now his case is in the Supreme Court. Last week it held an oral hearing in which the Court, with a conservative majority, expressed its doubts about Trump’s ability to fire a member of the Fed, an autonomous body that reports directly to Congress.

“That’s as much as Congress. And I’m not going to invest on that,” Powell said when asked by reporters about his supposed replacement. But the central banker did dare to give him two pieces of advice: “I might let you know a few issues: one is to remain out of electoral politics. Don’t let your self be dragged by it. Don’t do it,” he said in one of the most complicated appearances of his career. “And one other is that, as you understand, our window to Democratic accountability is Congress. And it isn’t a passive burden for us to go to Congress and discuss to folks. It’s an affirmative and common obligation. You win with elected supervisors, so it is one thing you need to work onerous at, and I’ve achieved that,” he added while leaving an additional message: “And lastly, it is easy to criticize authorities establishments in some ways. I’ll inform whoever you are about to satisfy. to probably the most certified group of individuals you haven’t solely labored with, however will ever work with. When you meet the folks on the Federal Reserve—and never all of them are excellent—there isn’t a higher group of public welfare professionals than those that work on the Federal Reserve.”

In parallel, the president of the United States has opened the process to replace Powell, whose term ends in May. The Republican president has entrusted the selection process to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who analyzed a dozen candidates. When it seemed that Kevin Hasset, the director of the National Economic Council and chief economic advisor to the White House, would be the one chosen, the Powell case. Analysts believe that his excessive loyalty to the president hurts his chances. The Republican leader cooled his chances last week when he told him in public: “I want you to stay where you are, if you want to know the truth.”

The fear of the markets’ reaction to the possible loss of the Fed’s independence made Trump change his mind, who is now debating between a shortlist of candidates: the former governor between 2006 and 2011, Kevin Warsh; Christopher Waller, current member of the Fed’s board of governors, and Blackrock executive Rick Rieder, who in recent days has become the favorite of prediction agencies such as Polymarket and Kalshi.

Part of the consensus is recovered

Trump’s campaign has had the opposite effect. In recent weeks, an alignment of the 12 governors around Powell has been taking place to make unity visible in the face of attacks on the Fed’s independence.

The decision to keep rates unchanged has been supported by 10 of the 12 governors who make up the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Federal Reserve body that decides on the price of money. Stephen Miran, Trump’s man on the board of governors, and Cristopher Waller, one of the candidates to replace Powell, voted for a quarter-point reduction.

“Available indicators recommend that financial exercise has expanded at a stable tempo. Job creation has remained low and the unemployment fee has proven indicators of stabilization. Inflation stays considerably elevated,” says the statement from the US central bank, which places the emphasis on “stable progress”, compared to the term “average”, which it used in the previous meeting in December.

Concern about dollar drift

Beyond political issues, bankers are concerned about the drift of the dollar. Analysts are selling dollar assets due to the accumulation of risks in recent weeks. On the one hand, they fear the effect that the White House’s continued attacks on the independence of the Federal Reserve may have. They believe that if the president manages to control the institution, the probability of inflationary episodes in the medium term will increase and affect the performance of the world’s largest economy.

On the other hand, they are concerned about the continuous swings in the geopolitical management of Trump, who last week showed his desire to annex Greenland, threatens his traditional partners with new tariffs and is determined to change the rules of the world political order unilaterally. At the same time, Europe seems to be willing to stand up to the American giant for the first time. Their Canadian neighbors are showing signs that they have grown tired of their continued threats. Finally, the financial crisis in which Japan is sinking seems to also threaten the United States. The Japanese yen is depreciating rapidly and the Federal Reserve does not rule out having to approve coordinated action to prevent the waves from spreading to the other side of the Pacific. The rapid rise in long-term rates in Japan has led the dollar to be exchanged at $1.195 per euro, the lowest level since 2021, after falling 2.7% in a week.

“The US dollar, which started a bearish trend last year, will probably continue to weaken, because the US wants a weaker dollar,” explains Thomas Friedberger of Tikehau Capital. “In that context, will probably be more and more unsure for an investor in some other European nation to take a position exterior Europe. Uncertainty, normal volatility and volatility in change charges will improve,” he warns. “The threat of a weaker greenback is the narrative of a relative decline of the United States, with implications for capital flows. Bonds, not inflation, are probably the most susceptible to greenback weak point,” remembers Donovan of UBS.

https://elpais.com/economia/2026-01-28/la-reserva-federal-mantiene-intactos-los-tipos-de-interes-pese-a-las-dudas-en-torno-al-dolar-y-los-ataques-de-trump.html