Labour rebels pressure Starmer into humiliating climbdown on Mandelson recordsdata | EUROtoday

Keir Starmer’s management has been plunged into turmoil after livid Labour MPs pressured him right into a humiliating climbdown over the discharge of full vetting paperwork regarding Peter Mandelson’s appointment because the UK’s ambassador within the US.

The prime minister’s dramatic U-turn adopted intense strain, led by former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, simply hours after he admitted that he knew about Lord Mandelson’s continued friendship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein – however appointed him as US ambassador anyway.

Despite the revelation, which led many to query Sir Keir’s integrity and judgment, he insisted he was repeatedly lied to by the disgraced peer, who he stated had “betrayed our country” over the alleged leak of delicate authorities paperwork to the disgraced financier.

The prime minister had tried to limit the publication of the vetting paperwork, arguing that some particulars would have to be redacted on nationwide safety grounds. That prompted accusations from Labour MPs that he was partaking in a “cover-up”.

open image in gallery

Finally, three hours right into a humble handle debate, Sir Keir relented after Ms Rayner intervened to make it clear she can be supporting the Tory proposal for the unbiased Intelligence and Security Committee to resolve which paperwork may very well be revealed.

It is unclear when the paperwork will likely be launched to the committee and made public, however there’s hypothesis that they may very well be accessible as early as Thursday.

Seizing on the U-turn, a Conservative spokesman stated: “Kemi [Badenoch] forced Starmer to admit he’d known Mandelson was still hanging out with Epstein after the child sex conviction, and No 10 went ahead and appointed Mandelson anyway.

“You may really feel within the Commons that was the second Labour MPs stopped backing the prime minister. The authorities have now needed to cave to Kemi’s demand for all paperwork to go to the ISC. Starmer is not in management; Kemi is looking the photographs.”

The prime minister had earlier claimed that the police investigations into Lord Mandelson and diplomatic relations needed to be protected.

In a desperate bid to draw a line under the scandal at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), Sir Keir went on the attack over his former ambassador, who was sacked in September after further revelations of his relationship with Epstein came to light.

open image in gallery

He told MPs: “Mandelson betrayed our country, our Parliament and my party.

“He lied repeatedly to my staff when requested about his relationship with Epstein earlier than and through his tenure as ambassador. I remorse appointing him. If I knew then what I do know now, he would by no means have been wherever close to authorities.”

And with his future on the line, it is understood that Sir Keir is planning yet another reset with a major speech on Thursday, to position himself as the champion of “decency and respect”.

Despite the apparent mea culpa, MPs were left unconvinced by the prime minister’s anger and promises over transparency. During a debate over more than six hours, the fury on both sides of the House was fully on display.

In a heated PMQs, Ms Badenoch said: “Keir Starmer has confirmed he knew about Mandelson’s continued relationship with the paedophile Epstein when he appointed him ambassador.

“His catastrophic judgment has harmed the special relationship, endangered national security, and embarrassed our nation.”

More damaging, though, were the Labour MPs who lined up to attack Sir Keir and his government.

Andy McDonald criticised the “appalling failure of judgment” in appointing the peer, saying: “I feel many people have nonetheless acquired lingering considerations, firstly concerning the worldwide relations situation, that would imply something.”

Former frontbencher Richard Burgon railed against the culture within the Labour Party, which Mandelson represented, warning: “The appointment of Peter Mandelson to this important role was literally indefensible.”

In another intervention, Apsana Begum, the Labour MP for Poplar and Limehouse, demanded that internal Labour documents, phone messages and electronic communications were also released to MPs.

open image in gallery

Another Labour MP, Paula Barker, announced she was “ashamed” at the government for trying to limit publication of the vetting documents on Lord Mandelson’s appointment, adding that she “implored” them to remove the amendment.

Prior to the government’s U-turn to allow the release of the full papers, Labour MP John McDonnell warned he would rebel on Sir Keir’s amendment to redact some documents, arguing that it could lead to a cover-up.

The former shadow chancellor said: “I’ll vote in opposition to the federal government’s modification right this moment that tries to exclude papers from the inquiry into Mandelson on the grounds of ‘prejudicial to worldwide relations’.

“This is so wide that it opens up the prime minister to allegations of collusion in a cover-up.”

Lord Mandelson formally retired from the House of Lords on Wednesday – earlier than Sir Keir had the prospect to strip him of his peerage – after recordsdata launched by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) final Friday appeared to indicate he leaked delicate authorities info to Epstein whereas serving as enterprise secretary in Gordon Brown’s Labour administration.