‘Kanzi’, the bonobo who demonstrates with a fictitious juice that the power to think about isn’t completely human | Science | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

At first look, the scene is nothing extraordinary. A low desk, two clear cups and an empty jug. Face to face, Christopher Krupenye, professor at Johns Hopkins University (United States) and a 43-year-old bonobo named Work take part in what looks as if a tea social gathering of Alice in Wonderlandhowever with out teapots or cookies. The scientist tilts the jug over one cup after which the opposite, as if pouring an invisible liquid. Then, empty one in all them, shaking the container to verify not even an imaginary drop stays. Then take a look at Work and asks, “where is the juice?” The primate raises his arm and factors to the proper cup that – in keeping with the foundations of the sport – accommodates it, fully difficult one of the ingrained boundaries of comparative psychology.

This easy gesture is the guts of a brand new examine printed this Thursday within the journal Science and that opens the talk about whether or not people are actually the one ones able to visualizing what doesn’t exist. This is the primary experimental proof {that a} non-human primate can generate secondary representations, a kind of pondering that enables an imaginary state to be maintained within the thoughts with out complicated it with actuality. “We already had evidence in other species, but we did not have empirical evidence that they were capable of understanding the simulation,” Amalia Bastos, co-author of the invention and professor on the University of St. Andrews (Scotland), explains to EL PAÍS.

But that's it

When the researcher met Work for the primary time in 2023, he requested her and Krupenye to chase and tickle one another. Although they weren’t doing it for actual, this interplay led her to marvel if the bonobo was having fun with the simulation sport or pretense. Before launching the experiment, the staff verified that the bonobo was capable of distinguish between cups with actual juice and empty containers. In 18 consecutive trials, he selected the juice 77% of the time.

Thus, after a collection of experiments carried out on the Ape Initiative, an Iowa analysis heart devoted to ape conservation, Work He interacted with cups and wells with imaginary grapes. Bastos specifies that the bonobo was not pretending: “What we show is that he understood the simulation, which is different.” the scientist manipulated the juice and inside that pretended context, Work I understood what was taking place. A key background to this work comes from developmental psychology. At the tip of the Nineteen Eighties, Scottish researcher Alan M. Leslie designed this now traditional experimental mannequin that solely requires the pointing gesture and dispenses with using advanced language. With it he demonstrated that kids at two years previous can deal with secondary representations. It is because of this that Krupenye and Bastos took it as a bridge to adapt a human paradigm to a bonobo incapable of verbalizing.

The potential to carry in thoughts a world that doesn’t exist is the muse of a number of the skills that we normally think about completely human: imagining attainable futures, attributing beliefs to others, or exploring options that would not occur on the similar time. Miquel Llorente, professor of primatology on the University of Girona, thinks that the experiment is spectacular, however clarifies that it needs to be checked if different specimens can do the identical. “The study would have to be replicated, going from a single individual who is the main limitation of the sample to others, to be able to isolate variables,” he emphasizes.

If a bonobo can think about, even in a guided surroundings, the basis of those skills might return to our final widespread ancestor with apes, six to 9 million years in the past, the analysis suggests. “That Work “The incontrovertible fact that he didn’t present frustration at not being rewarded after mentioning imaginary objects is additional proof that he understood that there was no actual object within the container he was pointing at,” the main author emphasizes to this newspaper.

Work was trained for decades to communicate using lexigrams, a methodology that has been used since 1970 in which primates often press buttons and point to images to communicate. He captivated scientists and the world with his ability to understand American English, a skill he learned naturally while accompanying his adoptive mother. Skills to experiments at the Emory National Primate Research Center in Atlanta. He passed away in 2025, leaving an indelible legacy on primate cognition.

“We knew he could be the best participant as a result of he might reply to spoken English and comply with imaginary objects like a toddler. Still, I did not assume he would achieve success, and I used to be stunned,” Christopher Krupenye recalls. Anecdotal observations of chimpanzees and bonobos interacting with imaginary objects have accumulated over the years. The research of Richard W. Wrangham, a professor at Harvard University, documented fascinating behavior in the community of juvenile chimpanzees of Kanyawara (Uganda) who manipulated stones and sticks without a practical purpose, but rather playful and symbolic.

The actions seemed to reflect play similar to how human children play with dolls or caress stuffed animals. Llorente points out that it would be interesting to continue conducting studies like this one to confirm whether apes can generate their own simulation beyond the compression of human simulation. “Language is a cognitive amplifier in humans, causing a brutal leap in the development of boys and girls when they incorporate it,” adds the Spanish researcher. This allows you to think in a different way and part of the genius of this bonobo is due to the fact that it is “a linguistic and hyperesthetic animal.”

Animal cognition specialist Antonio J. Osuna Mascaró, postdoctoral researcher at the Messerli Research Institute of the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna (Austria), maintains that this work illustrates the difficulties inherent in analyzing imagination in other living beings. Osuna thinks that the challenge, as we move away from our own species, is to design adapted experiments that allow evaluation without resorting to such anthropocentric frameworks. “We will need designs that move away from the ease of asking where is the juice. It will be a matter of time and creativity on the part of scientists before we can have an answer,” he tells SMC Spain.

Recent work not solely reveals {that a} bonobo can observe a non-existent object. It additionally reminds us that creativeness, that spark that enables us to create attainable worlds, will not be a human privilege, however a shared evolutionary legacy. “My hope is that our discovery that these animals have rich mental lives that go beyond the here and now… will motivate the world to join us in the effort to protect them,” displays Krupenye, since solely about 15,000 to twenty,000 of them stay within the Congo, the one place on the planet the place they’re free. The subsequent step for this professional will likely be to proceed finding out creativeness in animals and apes, together with the skills to consider the longer term and to take the attitude of others.

https://elpais.com/ciencia/2026-02-05/kanzi-el-bonobo-que-demuestra-con-un-zumo-ficticio-que-la-capacidad-de-imaginar-no-es-exclusivamente-humana.html