PM knew what Mandelson was like – he is both silly or thinks we’re | Politics | News | EUROtoday

Can’t resolve whether or not Keir Starmer is terminally silly or he simply thinks all of us are. I watched his rambling press convention this week – which was speculated to be concerning the authorities’s £800million initiative to avoid wasting the High Street (which wouldn’t want saving if Wrecker Reeves hadn’t taxed companies to hell and again) – and concluded he’s not simply THE most disastrous PM in historical past he’s additionally a morally bankrupt coward who’s 100% self-serving and can do something to cling onto energy.

First, he apologised to all Epstein’s victims for what occurred to them, which had completely nothing to do with him or his job as PM and nothing to do with the excessive road initiative he was launching. Then he rambled on about how his authorities had saved the nation (Eh?) – he talked about immigration, the cost-of-living disaster, even Palestine bought a point out. But then got here the self-serving bit when he tried to inform us he had no clue as to the extent of Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein when he appointed him US ambassador.

“He lied to me,” stated Starmer, pretending it was a shock {that a} bloke famed for mendacity would lie. He then had the audacity accountable the vetting process for Mandelson getting away with mendacity about his friendship with Epstein.

So, what is that this vetting process? Was it Starmer saying to Mandelson: “Peter are you up to your neck in it with that paedo?” Mandelson: “Absolutely not. Barely knew him”. Starmer: “Go on then, you’ve got the job. He then dobbed MI5 and MI6 in it for not telling him Mandelson was a bad ‘un even though they didn’t properly vet him until AFTER Starmer gave him the job. It was the Cabinet Office’s responsibility to compile a report which it did and which told Starmer about Mandelson’s close and ongoing relationship with Epstein.

It also presented him with a list of risks which Starmer ignored and then catapulted Mandelson into the job – because he needed him to build bridges between him and Trump! But to pretend he didn’t know about Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein is an insult to the intelligence of the British people. We’ve all known about it for years – how didn’t he?

Starmer knew exactly what Mandelson was and, like so many other Labour politicians now pretending to be reaching for the smelling salts at discovering just how dark the Prince of Darkness is, he used his talents when it suited him.

Everyone knew Mandelson was an evil genius and Labour politicians were queuing up to weaponise his evil when they needed it to boost their careers. Just look at the hypocrite Wes Streeting this week – traipsing around TV studios pretending to be on the verge of tears at the shock of Mandelson’s betrayal, omitting to mention he’s also spent the week deleting photographs of him and his “mentor” Mandelson having enjoyable collectively.

It was only some months in the past Starmer referred to Mandelson as “Our friend Peter”. Now he spits out the phrase “Mandelson” like its poison. And it might effectively simply be the poison that lastly does for him. And it ought to. Because this saga has proven now we have a morally-bankrupt PM who’s with out a shred of integrity and who will shaft anybody and everybody (together with the safety companies) to cling onto energy.

He’s even pretending he can’t present us the paperwork surrounding Mandelson’s appointment as a result of it would hamper the police investigation. Tosh! Those papers will likely be stored hidden for the easy motive they’ll expose Starmer’s lies. Bottom line right here. Even if he knew nothing of the element concerning the MandelsonEpstein friendship, the PM ought to by no means have appointed the perfect mate of a paedophile to excessive workplace. End of!