After assembly with Bibi: Trump insists on negotiations with Iran – “Hopefully they will be more sensible this time” | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Israel’s authorities warns towards an settlement with Iran that’s restricted solely to its nuclear program. Trump is now making it clear that he prefers a deal.

After a gathering with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump made it clear that he prefers an settlement with Iran to navy steps presently. He “insisted” that negotiations with Tehran proceed to search out out whether or not a deal was attainable, Trump wrote on the Truth Social platform.

Israel has lengthy warned towards an settlement with Iran that’s restricted solely to the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program. The Jewish state is demanding that its arch-enemy additionally scale down its ballistic missile arsenal and assist for its allies within the area. Netanyahu’s workplace stated after the assembly in Washington that he had agreed with Trump to “continue close coordination and close contact.”

Trump and Netanyahu had additionally made completely different public statements earlier than Israel’s assault on Iran in June 2025 – earlier than the US navy joined in and bombed Iran’s nuclear amenities virtually per week later. Israel’s assault got here only a day earlier than a deliberate spherical of additional negotiations between Washington and Tehran over Iran’s nuclear program.

Iran determined towards an settlement on the time, Trump wrote after his current assembly with Netanyahu, including: “Hopefully they will be more sensible and responsible this time.”

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on Platform X: “We prefer diplomatic means.” An settlement on Iran’s “peaceful nuclear program is possible, but only if it is fair and balanced,” he wrote. Iran “will not shy away from defending its sovereignty, whatever the cost.”

Several Israeli media shops had beforehand reported that Netanyahu’s authorities thought-about one other battle with its arch-enemy to be inevitable and finally solely a matter of time. The cause given was Tehran’s intransigent stance within the negotiations.

The Wall Street Journal, citing three US officers, reported that the Pentagon had ordered a second plane service group to arrange for deployment within the Middle East. However, Trump has not but issued an official order for deployment and the plans might nonetheless change.

Trump had beforehand instructed the US information portal Axios that he was contemplating sending one other plane service to the area for a attainable assault if negotiations with Iran failed. “Either there will be a deal or we will have to take very tough measures like last time,” Trump was quoted as saying. In view of the clearly elevated danger of battle, Israeli media categorised the assembly between Netanyahu and the US President as groundbreaking.

In current weeks, the USA has elevated its navy presence within the area, together with with the plane service “USS Abraham Lincoln”. The second plane service group would be part of him. According to info from the Wall Street Journal, different warships, air protection techniques and fighter squadrons are already within the Gulf area.

No date for additional negotiations but

Trump additionally justifies his actions by saying that there have been mass protests in Iran in January, which the state safety equipment brutally suppressed. The assembly between Trump and Netanyahu got here a number of days after US and Iranian representatives started new negotiations in Oman’s capital Muscat final week. Trump then held out the prospect of a continuation – however an actual date for this has not but been set.

The central query is what occurs if the negotiations fail, wrote Israeli Iran professional Danny Citrinowicz on X. “What exactly would Washington want to achieve with a military strike?” Without a “clearly defined political end goal, there is a risk that military action could lead to escalation without a strategic solution,” he warned. “Coercion without a realistic prospect of regime surrender or collapse requires a carefully defined and limited goal.” Otherwise, the US risked “a confrontation with an uncertain outcome.”

dpa/jac

https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article698d4f98f4d0b8d94ca1973d/nach-treffen-mit-bibi-trump-besteht-auf-verhandlungen-mit-iran-hoffentlich-werden-sie-dieses-mal-vernuenftiger-sein.html