FBI Notes From Interviews With Trump Accuser Omitted From Epstein Database | EUROtoday

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department’s public database of the Epstein Files incorporates an allegation President Donald Trump abused a minor a long time in the past, however paperwork from an obvious FBI investigation into the allegation should not public regardless of a legislation mandating their disclosure.

A compilation of accusations towards outstanding names, a doc the Justice Department assembled final summer time from its investigatory information on Jeffrey Epstein, included one from an unidentified accuser who claimed: “Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out.”

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the highest Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, stated he reviewed unredacted Epstein information this week at a facility the Justice Department arrange for members of Congress. He stated Tuesday that FBI types recounting interviews with the Trump accuser have been overlooked of the general public database.

“Oversight Democrats can confirm that the DOJ appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with this survivor who accused President Trump of heinous crimes,” Garcia stated in a press release. “Covering up direct evidence of a potential assault by the President of the United States is the most serious possible crime in this White House cover up.”

Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), one other member of the Oversight Committee, stated she additionally reviewed a number of the unredacted Epstein information on Monday and noticed paperwork reflecting the FBI following up on tips on an accusation towards Trump.

“It’s clear that the FBI investigated this case and found it to be a credible case,” Stansbury informed HuffPost. “I can tell you unequivocally the FBI investigated it.”

Asked for remark, the Justice Department referred to a social media put up responding to Democrats, insisting nothing has been improperly withheld.

“If files are temporarily pulled for victim redactions or to redact Personally Identifiable Information, then those documents are promptly restored online and are publicly available,” the division stated in its put up. “ALL responsive documents have been produced unless a document falls within one of the following categories: duplicates, privileged, or part of an ongoing federal investigation.”

Members of Congress have already complained concerning the Trump administration withholding a few of its Epstein materials, opposite to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which handed each chambers of Congress final fall. The division withholding details about the president can be a major growth.

A story from National Public Radio on Tuesdayconstructing on earlier work by the unbiased journalist Roger Sollenbergerlaid out the general public proof that sure paperwork are lacking.

The information shops reported that the Trump accusation within the abstract file matches an FBI tip consumption typefrom when the Justice Department was urgent intercourse trafficking expenses towards Epstein in 2019, that was included within the disclosed information. The type indicated the incident supposedly occurred round 35 years in the past in New Jersey, when the sufferer would have been 13 or 14. Biographical particulars of the accuser, stated to have lived in South Carolina, match these of an unnamed Epstein accuser from that state who joined a civil lawsuit towards the property of the deceased intercourse trafficker and financier in 2019.

“Jane Doe 4 was brutally and forcibly battered, assaulted, and raped by these other men she met through Epstein,” that grievance stated. “On one occasion, one of these prominent men forcibly slapped Jane Doe 4 in the face after she was forced to perform oral sex on him. This same man forcibly raped her, penetrating her both vaginally and anally. On information and belief, Epstein was aware of and, indeed encouraged, the assault of Jane Doe 4 by these other men.”

Jane Doe 4’s account within the civil grievance of how she met Epstein matches an FBI abstract of a 2019 interview with an Epstein sufferer. As Sollenberger first famousa serial quantity on the interview abstract reveals up in a spreadsheet of witness materials from the trial of Epstein confederate Ghislaine Maxwell. That spreadsheet signifies the FBI interviewed the witness three extra occasions, and offered the paperwork to Maxwell’s protection workforce.

There had been no paperwork with the related serial numbers accessible within the Epstein library database when HuffPost searched on Tuesday, though the numbers are listed within the spreadsheet. NPR reported “dozens” of different proof paperwork are lacking from the general public database.

The Justice Department has insisted it has totally complied with a legislation, handed by overwhelming margins in Congress final yr, requiring the discharge of the information, although Democrats and a handful of Republicans led by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) have argued the DOJ isn’t complying with the legislation. Massie informed reporters he hadn’t seemed on the Trump accusation.

“I’ve got a lot of other ones I’m looking into,” Massie stated.

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) referred to as it a critical accusation, however advised it’s attainable Democrats are misinterpreting the information, pointing to Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) itemizing names of males he mistakenly believed had been Epstein co-conspirators.

“We take it seriously. We’ll look and see,” Comer informed HuffPost. “I haven’t seen a lot out of some of the Democrats on the Oversight Committee that would lead me to believe they’re tremendous investigators.”