Karoline Leavitt Says Trump Bombed Iran Due To A ‘Feeling, Based On Fact’ | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt grew to become the topic of a lot social media mockery on Wednesday for her clarification behind President Donald Trump’s latest resolution to bomb Iran.

The administration has supplied a sequence of shifting causes for the strikes, however Leavitt added yet one more to the combination: vibes, mainly.

During Wednesday’s press briefing, a reporter from The Independent requested why the administration “can’t say what the imminent threat against the United States was” that required the U.S. to launch Operation Epic Fury.

The press secretary declared that she would “explain to you exactly what led the president to make the decision” — and it appeared to boil all the way down to emotions.

“This decision to launch this operation was based on a cumulative effect of various direct threats that Iran posed to the United States of America, and the president’s feeling, based on fact, that Iran does pose an imminent and direct threat to the United States of America,” she mentioned.

Leavitt known as Iran “the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism,” mentioned it was “rapidly and aggressively building up” its missile program, and accused the nation of being “hellbent on death and destruction.”

She continued, “The president had a feeling, again, based on fact, that Iran was going to strike the United States, was going to strike our assets in the region, and he made a determination to launch Operation Epic Fury based on all of those reasons.”

You can see the whole alternate within the video beneath.

Considering that “facts don’t care about your feelings” is a pet phrase of many conservatives due to podcaster Ben Shapiro, many individuals on social media had been couldn’t assist however discover Leavitt’s phrasing.

We went to conflict primarily based on a “feeling” that Iran was going to assault the US (regardless that they don’t have the capability to launch a strike towards our homeland).

I’m beginning to assume the preliminary explanations over the weekend for this conflict had been higher than the day-5 rationals. https://t.co/Tsx1r2j4Yh

— Michael McFaul (@McFaul) March 4, 2026

Can you think about the Republican response if a lady president mentioned she went to conflict as a result of she had a “feeling” https://t.co/eJq82K1FB8

— Ally Sammarco (@Ally_Sammarco) March 4, 2026

This is what, their 4th try to supply a coherent rationale for this conflict? About all one can say is that it will get much less and fewer convincing as they go alongside. Karoline Leavitt is now speaking about “feeling[s] based on fact.” What does that even imply? Give us precise info and… https://t.co/49dKqqH75V

— Scot Lehigh (@GlobeScotLehigh) March 4, 2026

A president attacking one other nation primarily based on a sense is unacceptable. It’s like Alex Jones saying God known as on him to show the deep state whereas he was consuming a rooster fried steak. Except individuals are dying due to it. https://t.co/G5MEU9oR49

— Mike Rothschild (@rothschildmd on blu sky) (@rothschildmd) March 4, 2026

Remember after 9/11 they took nearly two years convincing the American those that Iraq was answerable for 9/11 and was creating weapons to do one thing worse. Now it’s simply “I felt like it.” https://t.co/ARa78YVcSD

— evan loves worf (@esjesjesj) March 4, 2026


https://www.huffpost.com/entry/karoline-leavitt-trump-feeling-based-on-fact_n_69a88b38e4b0865be0c6f236