Jewish demise row inmate granted new trial over claims that choose was antisemitic | EUROtoday

The newest headlines from our reporters throughout the US despatched straight to your inbox every weekday

Your briefing on the most recent headlines from throughout the US

A Texas appeals court docket ordered a brand new trial Wednesday for a Jewish man on demise row — who was a part of a gang of prisoners that fatally shot a police officer in 2000 after escaping — due to antisemitic bias by the choose who presided over his case.

Lawyers for Randy Halprin have contended that former Judge Vickers Cunningham in Dallas used racial slurs and antisemitic language to discuss with him and a few of his co-defendants.

Halprin, 47, was among the many group of inmates referred to as the “ Texas 7,” who escaped from a South Texas jail in December 2000 after which dedicated quite a few robberies, together with the one by which they shot 29-year-old Irving police officer Aubrey Hawkins 11 occasions, killing him.

By a vote of 6-3, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ordered that Halprin’s conviction be overturned and that he be given a brand new trial after concluding that Cunningham was biased in opposition to him on the time of his trial as a result of he’s Jewish.

The appeals court docket discovered proof confirmed that in his life, Cunningham repeated unsupported antisemitic narratives. When Cunningham grew to become a choose, he continued to make use of derogatory language about Jewish individuals outdoors the courtroom “with ‘great hatred, (and) disgust’ and increasing intensity as the years passed,” the court docket stated.

It additionally stated that, throughout Halprin’s trial, Cunningham made offensive antisemitic remarks outdoors the courtroom about Halprin particularly and Jews generally.

“The uncontradicted evidence supports a finding that Cunningham formed an opinion about Halprin that derived from an extrajudicial factor — Cunningham’s poisonous antisemitism,” the appeals court docket wrote in its ruling.

The court docket beforehand halted Halprin’s execution in 2019.

“Today, the Court of Criminal Appeals took a step towards broader trust in the criminal law by throwing out a hopelessly tainted death judgment handed down by a bigoted and biased judge,” Tivon Schardl, one among Halprin’s attorneys, stated in an announcement. “It also reminded Texans that religious bigotry has no place in our courts.”

The order for a brand new trial got here after state District Judge Lela Mays in Dallas stated in a December 2022 ruling that Cunningham didn’t or couldn’t curb the affect of his antisemitic bias in his judicial decision-making throughout the trial.

Mays wrote that Cunningham used racist, homophobic and antisemitic slurs to discuss with Halprin and the opposite escaped inmates.

Cunningham stepped down from the bench in 2005 and is now an legal professional in personal observe in Dallas. His workplace stated Wednesday that he wouldn’t be commenting on Halprin’s case.

Cunningham beforehand denied allegations of bigotry after telling the Dallas Morning News in 2018 that he has a residing belief that rewards his youngsters for marrying straight, white Christians. He had opposed interracial marriages however later instructed the newspaper that his views developed.

The Tarrant County District Attorney’s Office was appointed to deal with authorized points associated to Halprin’s allegations after the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, which prosecuted the case, was disqualified.

In September 2022, Tarrant County prosecutors filed court docket paperwork by which they stated Halprin ought to get a brand new trial as a result of Cunningham confirmed “actual bias” in opposition to him.

Of the seven inmates who escaped, one killed himself earlier than the group was arrested. Four have been executed. Another, Patrick Murphy, awaits execution.