seized by LFI, the Constitutional Council validates the vast majority of the textual content | EUROtoday

The Constitutional Council, seized by “rebellious” deputies who contested a number of measures of the Social Security finances for 2026, validated the vast majority of the articles on Tuesday, December 30, however censoring in substance a measure aimed toward redefining incapacity for work.

“The Constitutional Council validates the majority of the articles before it of the Social Security financing law for 2026”introduced the establishment, in a press launch accompanying its choice. Regarding a budgetary textual content, it’s customary for the establishment to render its choice earlier than December 31.

Around sixty deputies from La France insoumise (LFI) and three different elected officers had contacted the Constitutional Council to contest round ten articles – out of the 114 – of the Social Security financing legislation, definitively adopted in mid-December by Parliament. The authors of the referral thought-about that these measures undermined the safety of the suitable to well being. They thus contested the target of medical insurance expenditure, judging its 3% improve inadequate in relation to wants.

But these aims “were determined taking into account, in particular, the effects of inflation as well as the increase in health expenditure and the charges of health establishments”thought-about the Council, validating this provision in addition to many of the contested measures.

Censorship of 9 “social riders”

The Constitutional Council additionally didn’t comply with the authors of the referral relating to an article which restricted the length of a primary work stoppage to at least one month and any renewal to 2 months, though there is no such thing as a restrict for the second.

He additionally validated the process for adopting the institution of a brand new “support journey” with preventive functions for sufferers susceptible to long-term sickness (ALD). LFI needed censorship of the article or “a reservation of interpretation” For “guarantee that the creation of this new prevention pathway does not become a pretext for excluding many socially insured people from ALD status”.

On the opposite hand, the smart males censored a measure aimed toward clarifying the definition of incapacity for work. The textual content acknowledged that an insured individual can profit from compensation if he’s unable to train “any salaried or non-salaried professional activity”. This article – quantity 83 – might doubtlessly deprive an insured individual of compensation if he was able to finishing up any exercise apart from his unique career, “without being able to take into account, in particular, one’s personal situation and the reality of a professional alternative”based on the Council.

Without ruling on their constitutionality, the judges additionally censored 9 provisions which, of their eyes, had no place on this Social Security finances. Among these “social riders” In specific, there’s an article establishing a monetary sanction for healthcare professionals who don’t respect their obligation to supply data to sufferers’ shared medical information. This measure was strongly criticized by liberal medical doctors.