Kemi Badenoch refuses to apologise after claiming Labour was being known as a ‘paedo defenders party’ | EUROtoday

Kemi Badenoch has stated she would “absolutely not apologise” for claiming Labour was being branded a “paedo defenders party” throughout Prime Minister’s Questions.

During their weekly trade on Wednesday, the Conservative chief challenged Sir Keir Starmer straight, stating he ought to “ask why his backbenchers are saying that they’re being called the ‘paedo defenders party’”.

Her controversial jibe adopted a report in The Times, which detailed how feminine Labour MPs had knowledgeable Sir Keir earlier this month that voters had “screamed” the phrase at them on the street, linking it to the Peter Mandelson scandal.

Ms Badenoch’s remarks have since drawn important criticism from Labour MP Natalie Fleet, who was groomed as an adolescent, and Katie Amess, the daughter of murdered Tory MP Sir David Amess.

Ms Fleet advised LBC the usage of the time period was “just really disgusting” and prompt it had put Labour activists in peril.

She stated: “There are hundreds of thousands of political activists, Labour and otherwise, that want to make the country a better place and to just throw language like that around because it might get you some extra votes is just really disgusting.”

Ms Amess stated it had been “very inflammatory” and known as for Ms Badenoch to apologise, including: “It’s not the way that our politicians should be talking, unfortunately.”

Appearing on a phone-in on LBC on Wednesday night, Ms Badenoch stood by her feedback, saying: “I will absolutely not apologise.”

She added: “I remember when Keir Starmer and the Labour Party were putting out posters saying Rishi Sunak was supporting paedophiles so that they wouldn’t go to prison.

“These people know how to dish it but they don’t want to take it.”

Ms Badenoch declined to say whether or not she thought Labour was a celebration of “paedo defenders”, saying: “It wasn’t my words, a female Labour MP used that language.”

She added: “Nobody would be calling them that if they held themselves to higher standards.”