Lhe statements by the President of the Republic on Gérard Depardieu pained me, surprised me, as they pained and surprised all those that battle in opposition to violence in opposition to girls. Our ache and our astonishment are all of the larger as we may have anticipated from a younger president, elected on the promise of a ” new world “, that he’s forward of all the political class on this difficulty. Since his election, it has been fairly the other. Concerning sexist and sexual violence, he’ll stay a person who didn’t perceive his occasions and didn’t know the best way to reside as much as what might be anticipated of his place.
He wouldn’t have been, to begin with, by imagining that he may use sexist and sexual violence as a counterattack to his authorities’s failure on the immigration invoice. The difficulty is simply too critical to be exploited politically. Furthermore, it’s misunderstanding to cut back it to a divide of opinion or a supposed battle between wokists and conservatives. From all of the testimonies that I’ve collected in my life as a girl and elected official, I can attest that incest, rape and beatings spare no era, no social class or any political affiliation. Of all the boys I’ve met, I also can attest that the overwhelming majority are frozen at the concept that the sight of their little daughter may arouse probably the most obscene reactions and that, worse, they’re victims of those predators. . The President of the Republic ought to have united round this battle. He can have made the unforgivable error of eager to make it a divisive topic.
In the identical manner, Emmanuel Macron won’t have lived as much as his position by hiding behind a justice system which he is aware of completely properly is struggling in relation to sexist and sexual violence. Every yr, greater than 90,000 girls report having been raped or tried rape. Less than 10% of them file a criticism. And, of all of the complaints filed, 80% are dismissed and 1% end in a prison conviction, in keeping with figures from the High Council for Equality between Women and Men. The absence of a conviction doesn’t imply that the complainant was not a sufferer. It signifies that the info couldn’t be confirmed or had been prescribed.
Furthermore, if Emmanuel Macron actually needed justice to be more practical, a want unanimously shared, why is he against the creation of a definition of rape primarily based on the absence of consent inside the framework of European laws at the moment being negotiated in Brussels? Very typically, victims wrestle to have rape acknowledged due to the necessity to show that the perpetrator acted with violence, coercion, menace or shock. This new definition of rape would open the opportunity of higher authorized therapy. By personally opposing it, Emmanuel Macron is stopping France from enjoying a historic driving position in Europe.
You have 40% of this text left to learn. The relaxation is reserved for subscribers.
https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2023/12/31/nelly-garnier-lr-concernant-les-violences-sexistes-et-sexuelles-emmanuel-macron-restera-un-homme-qui-n-a-pas-compris-son-epoque_6208555_823448.html