The Citizenship Amendment Act offers non-Muslims from neighboring international locations with a path to Indian citizenship. It applies to asylum claims filed by Hindus, Sikhs, Parsis, Buddhists, Jains and Christians from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh who fled to the Hindu-majority India earlier than 2015 — however not Muslims, who make up a majority within the three international locations.
Critics say a regulation that makes use of faith as a criterion for citizenship violates the secularism embraced by the nation’s founders. The regulation, which Modi delayed implementing over the unrest it prompted, has stoked fears of the potential for a broader effort to strip citizenship from Muslims in India who lack paperwork.
The announcement by Modi’s authorities that it will start to implement the act nationwide drew cheers from Hindu nationalist teams in India and overseas. The teams see the regulation as a step in making India a sanctuary for Hindus and lending the Indian state a extra explicitly non secular character. The unrest to date has been comparatively restricted, in contrast with the bloodshed that erupted in 2019 over the measure.
During the protests 4 years in the past, movies unfold on-line of police assaulting college students in a library at a Muslim-majority college in New Delhi. Two months later, lethal riots erupted as then-President Donald Trump visited town. More than 50 folks died, and greater than 100 of these detained are nonetheless in jail, based on native media experiences.
The upheaval left the regulation’s destiny in limbo. At the time, the U.N. Commissioner for Human Rights had referred to as the act “fundamentally discriminatory in nature and in breach of India’s international human rights obligations.”
In southern Tamil Nadu state, many ethnic Tamils have decried the fast-track program’s exclusion of Tamil Muslims who fled Sri Lanka. State chief M.Okay. Stalin, who hails from a Tamil political occasion, referred to as the act divisive and mentioned his state wouldn’t implement it. In northeast India’s Assam state, protests broke out over fears {that a} sudden inflow of non-Muslim migrants from neighboring Bangladesh may change the native cultural cloth. On college campuses in New Delhi, which have been hotbeds of protests in 2019, dozens of scholars have been detained, largely as a preemptive measure, by police.
Amit Shah, Modi’s right-hand man and the highly effective dwelling minister who is ready to supervise this system, argued that the act would solely present a house to those that are persecuted, not take citizenship away from others.
Opposition events within the nation have criticized Modi for ushering within the new act simply earlier than the election and accused his ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of utilizing divisive measures to attraction to Hindu voters. The BJP is broadly anticipated to win in nationwide elections to be held between April and May.
The authorities is in search of “polarization and distraction,” Sanjay Hegde, a lawyer who argues instances earlier than India’s Supreme Court, mentioned in an interview with journalist Barkha Dutt on Tuesday.
“Fundamentally, this is the objection to the CAA: That we are a country which does not have a preferred religion or a despised religion,” Hegde mentioned.
Gerry Shih contributed to this report.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/12/india-citizenship-law-muslims-modi-election/