Omar A.: Deportation debate about terror suspects – CDU politician speaks of “state failure” | EUROtoday

The Libyan Omar A. is claimed to have deliberate an assault on the Israeli embassy in Berlin. The rejected asylum seeker had been obliged to go away the nation for a very long time. CDU home politician Christoph de Vries holds the federal authorities accountable.

CDU MP Christoph de Vries is reproaching the federal authorities after the arrest of terror suspect Omar A. The Libyan is claimed to be a supporter of the terrorist group “Islamic State” (IS) and to have deliberate an assault on the Israeli embassy in Berlin. On Saturday he was arrested by safety forces in an asylum heart in Bernau, Brandenburg. The 28-year-old is now in custody.

“The Omar A. case is emblematic of the federal government’s failure to enforce departure obligations,” stated CDU politician de Vries to the “Bild” newspaper. Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) had promised large-scale deportations, however there was “no trace of this anywhere.” He spoke of “state failure”.

The “Bild” newspaper requested the Brandenburg Ministry of the Interior why Omar A. had not been deported after his asylum software was rejected in September 2023. The reply: “Repatriations to Libya are currently not possible because there is no direct flight connection for deportations there.” Regarding the query of why a deportation was not carried out by one other route, the authority stated: “There was no attempt at deportation. “

In addition, in Brandenburg, following a change in the law in mid-2024, the district is no longer responsible for carrying out a deportation, but rather the Central Foreigners Authority (ZABH) in the Ministry of the Interior. However, the district did not report Omar A. to the Central Immigration Office in a collective overview until July 2024 as being legally obliged to leave the country.

A spokesman for the district told the dpa news agency: “An individual report to the Central Foreigners Authority of the State of Brandenburg (ZABH) was not planned and was not made at this time.” This is due, among other things, to the fact that a return to Libya was already considered ” had been assessed as hopeless.

“In this case, what makes matters worse is that the person in question does not have a valid passport document,” stated the spokesman. That’s why the person acquired a toleration allow in November, which quickly prevents deportation.

The AfD in Brandenburg was outraged by the occasions. “It is another of countless examples of how terrorists can move around Germany unmolested as alleged refugees and plan violent acts while the state provides a roof over their heads and enough pocket money,” stated AfD parliamentary group chief Hans-Christoph Berndt on Monday “Tagesspiegel”. “This Libyan – like so many other perpetrators – should not have been here at all.”

Omar A. is claimed to have entered Germany in November 2022. In January 2023, the Libyan utilized for asylum, which was rejected eight months later. Before his arrest, the Libyan had not come to the eye of the German safety authorities as an extremist.

ll with dpa

https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article254179696/Omar-A-Abschiebedebatte-um-Terrorverdaechtigen-CDU-Politiker-spricht-von-Staatsversagen.html