The former deputy of Sumar Íñigo Errejón has assured that the criticism by actress Elisa Mouliaá is “false” and has requested the choose investigating him for sexual assault to reopen the case and permit him to testify to “expose the reality of the facts.” avoiding the “procedural limbo” wherein he has been plunged after the interruption of the case because of the being pregnant of the complainant’s lawyer.
In his attraction, collected by Europa Press, the previous parliamentary spokesperson for Sumar addresses Court Number 47 of Madrid and subsidiarily to the Provincial Court of Madrid criticizing what he considers a “reckless and rinsing delay to delay and delay the processing of this procedure, with evident bad faith and abuse of rights” by Mouliaá’s lawyer.
It was this similar Monday when Judge Adolfo Carretero agreed to briefly archive the case till the lawyer returned from her medical depart. The choose defined in his decision that Mouliaá “has refused to appoint another lawyer to replace her trust” so “the inevitable consequence is the impossibility of continuing the procedure.”
Errejón’s lawyer urges the Justice of the Peace to reopen the case in order that he can “declare as soon as possible” and that the actress be required to designate a brand new lawyer she trusts inside a “maximum period of 24 hours” who can take cost. , instantly, of his authorized illustration.”
In this context, the protection of the Más Madrid politician remembers that this case is just not “a civil procedure” however slightly a “criminal, exceptionally high-profile one, in which serious conduct is charged, and in which each day that passes” can’t be “ give the due explanations before the investigating body, to the public detriment of his honor and his right to the presumption of innocence.”
“Therefore, and also given the exceptional media significance of the process, respect for the procedural rights that protect Mr. Errejón must be no less exceptional to avoid the serious undue delays that the lawyer seeks until his reinstatement in more than 16 weeks ? March or April 2025?” he asks.
His lawyer emphasizes that Errejón’s “desire” was to testify in court docket final Tuesday, as initially deliberate, “in order to be able to offer the corresponding explanations before the judicial body and expose the reality of the facts, which are far from those described by the other party.” In any case, he assures that “he will assume the high costs of testing procedures carried out throughout the instruction phase.”
Errejón’s illustration assures that “trying to leave this unprecedented and surprising procedural impasse agreed by the instructor, and in which almost nothing happens for at least four months, is legally and humanly unacceptable.” “Bad faith is undoubtedly; and the abuse of rights, unquestionable,” he provides.
In the opinion of his protection, the order by which the choose agreed to archive the case “is legally incomprehensible and procedurally incongruent with the instructor’s own previous acts, which by previous ruling, and “because the illustration nor the withdrawal weren’t duly accredited, “medical or pregnancy” of Mouliaá’s lawyer, “required to appoint another lawyer of his confidence or someone to replace the physically incapacitated lawyer in order to safeguard the rights of the investigated.”
Mouliaá says that what he mentioned “is what happened”
The actress Elisa Mouliaá responded this Thursday to the attraction offered by the protection of the previous deputy of Sumar Íñigo Errejón, defending that her criticism for an alleged crime of sexual assault is just not “false” and that all the things she has mentioned “is what really happened.” and indicators.”
“I perceive that the anger is big, however in fact saying that it’s a false criticism appears regrettable to me as a result of it’s not. All I’m saying is what occurred with hairs and tails,” said the interpreter in statements to the program ‘And now Sonsoles’ on Antena 3.
The interpreter has acknowledged that she feels “quite paralyzed” after Errejón’s appeal and the “media launch” that she has experienced following the complaint, of which she has said that she presented it to “clarify what was happening and everything that happened.” Mouliaá has defended that he has recounted what happened and how that night with the former deputy became “one of the most unpleasant” of his life. “I have evidence and witnesses that all of this happened. So, I haven’t backed down. Obviously, right now, with everything the lawyer has written, I am scared and quite shocked, but now I only have to trust in justice and let my lawyer decide how to act,” he reiterated.
The actress recalled that her lawyer is on medical depart – which is why the choose briefly archived the open case till her return – and “in a complex situation.” “To say that all the things is fake and that there was unhealthy religion (…) The unhealthy religion appears to me to be coming from their facet now,” he concluded.
https://elpais.com/espana/2024-11-14/errejon-dice-que-la-denuncia-de-mouliaa-es-falsa-y-pide-declarar-para-exponer-la-realidad-de-los-hechos.html