LThe budgetary difficulties dealing with France and which the nationwide illustration is having such issue resolving are coupled with one other menace: for the reason that begin of the varsity yr, the French economic system has skilled a transparent financial downturn. Investment is slowing down, the unemployment curve is reversing, social plans and bankruptcies are growing, the attractiveness of the nation is deteriorating, the social local weather is turning into tense.
The causes are a number of: 4 years after the pandemic disaster, the measures that had been taken to guard the financial cloth are coming to an finish, inflicting a painful return to actuality for essentially the most fragile firms. Germany, our important buying and selling companion, is experiencing a recession which is beginning to have an effect on exercise in France. Finally, the political context creates an setting that isn’t very favorable to the decision-making of financial actors: confronted with fiscal uncertainty, households are saving and enterprise leaders are slowing down funding.
These difficulties come on the worst time, as a result of international competitors is intensifying. China, which seeks to revive its economic system via exports, is turning into more and more aggressive commercially. In the United States, with the election of Donald Trump, there’s a danger of ushering in a brand new period of protectionism, of which Europe will probably be, with China, the primary sufferer.
The European Union is alarmed. Failing to take selections that would profoundly name into query its functioning, it’s multiplying stories on methods to regain competitiveness within the face of blocs searching for to consolidate their financial energy, and requires speedy response.
Necessary sorting in bills
By distinction, the absence in France of any rational reflection on the conduct of financial coverage is clear. Parliamentary debates, marked by deep dissensions, boil right down to electoral postures and speeches. The left locks itself into the all-tax dogma. The proper rightly denounces the poor state of public accounts, however prefers to flatter its clientele (retirees, native elected officers) relatively than supporting a coherent restoration technique.
The Macronists, for his or her half, are bracing themselves on the protection of the provision coverage, on the pretext that it has made it doable for seven years to scale back unemployment and entice international traders, however they look like fully amnesiac on the budgetary slate they left behind. Today, the required sorting between good and dangerous expenditure can not spare the discount of costs, which signify an annual expenditure of greater than 70 billion euros and deserve cautious examination with regard to their effectiveness and the crucial of tax justice.
By settling in Matignon in notably troublesome circumstances, Michel Barnier tried to launch what France has at all times had the best issue in finishing up when it has its again towards the wall: to hold out budgetary restoration and the preservation of the manufacturing instrument. The steadiness he proposed to attempt to resolve the troublesome equation appeared cheap: just a little extra taxes, focused on those that can bear it, a lot much less public spending. But he relied on his power. At this level, the complete copy is deconstructed, and the one message that emerges is that everybody desires to proceed spending extra. The reflex is undoubtedly professional in a rustic searching for safety, expressed by a part of the inhabitants, however it’s not life like on the planet because it presents itself.
https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2024/11/20/economie-francaise-le-risque-de-la-spirale-negative_6404732_3232.html