Biden’s resolution to dam Nippon Steel takeover creates uncertainty for U.S. Steel employees | EUROtoday

By blocking a Japanese firm’s takeover of U.S. Steel, President Joe Biden stated he was defending good jobs within the American heartland. He could also be placing them in danger as a substitute.

In making its practically $15 billion bid for the storied Pittsburgh-based steelmaker, Nippon Steel had promised to speculate $2.7 billion in U.S. Steel’s growing older blast furnace operations in Gary, Indiana, and Pennsylvania’s Mon Valley. It additionally vowed to not scale back manufacturing capability within the United States over the following decade with out first getting U.S. authorities approval.

“They were going to invest in the Valley,’’ said Jason Zugai, an operating technician and vice president of the United Steelworkers union local at a U.S. Steel plant in the Mon Valley. “They committed to 10 years of no layoffs. We won’t have those commitments from anybody.’’

Zugai and some other Mon Valley steelworkers supported the Nippon deal in defiance of the union’s national leadership, which pressured the Biden administration to kill it.

Losing the Nippon-U.S. Steel deal “will be a disaster for Pennsylvania,’’ said Gordon Johnson, who follows U.S. Steel stock on Wall Street as founder of GLJ Research. “I really don’t understand. This is not in the interest of the workers. It’s not in the interest of the shareholders of U.S. Steel.’’

On Friday, Biden said he was stopping the Nippon takeover — after federal regulators deadlocked on whether to approve it — because “a strong domestically owned and operated steel industry represents an essential national security priority. … Without domestic steel production and domestic steel workers, our nation is less strong and less secure.’’

U.S. Steel stock dropped 6.5% on the news Friday.

The decision, announced less than three weeks before the president leaves the White House, reflects a growing bipartisan shift away from free trade and open investment.

President-elect Donald Trump had already come out against the Nippon takeover. “As President,” he wrote final month on his Truth Social platform, “I will block this deal from happening. Buyer Beware!!!”

In a joint assertion, Nippon and U.S. Steel referred to as Biden’s resolution “a clear violation of due process and the law’’ and suggested they would sue to salvage their deal: “We are left with no choice but to take all appropriate action to protect our legal rights.’’

U.S. Steel was founded in 1901 in a merger that involved American business titans J.P. Morgan and Andrew Carnegie and instantly created the largest company in the world. As the U.S. grew to world dominance in the 20th century, U.S. Steel grew with it. In 1943, at the height of the World War II manufacturing boom, U.S. Steel employed 340,000 people.

But foreign competition — from Japan in the 1970s and ‘80s and later from China — gradually eroded U.S. Steel’s position and forced it to close plants and lay off workers. The company now employs fewer than 22,000 in an industry dominated by the Chinese.

The U.S. government has sought over the years to protect U.S. Steel and other American steelmakers by imposing taxes on imported steel. During his first term, Trump slapped 25% tariffs on foreign steel, and Biden kept them or converted them into import quotas. Either way, the trade barriers kept the price of American steel artificially high, giving U.S. Steel and others a financial boost.

U.S. Steel is profitable and is sitting on $1.8 billion in cash, though that is down from $2.9 billion at the end of 2023.

United Steelworkers President David McCall declared Friday that U.S. Steel had the financial resources to go it alone. “It can easily remain a strong and resilient company,’’ he told reporters.

But U.S. Steel has said it needs the cash from Nippon Steel to keep investing in blast furnaces like the ones in Pennsylvania and Indiana.

“Without the Nippon Steel transaction, U. S. Steel will largely pivot away from its blast furnace facilities, putting thousands of good-paying union jobs at risk, negatively impacting numerous communities across the locations where its facilities exist,’’ U.S. Steel warned in September. The company also threatened to move its headquarters out of Pittsburgh.

On its own, U.S. Steel seems poised to focus on newer electric arc furnaces, such as its Big River plant in Arkansas, which can make high-quality steel products more efficiently and at lower prices compared to blast furnaces, said Josh Spoores, the Pennsylvania-based head of steel Americas analysis for commodity researcher CRU.

“I don’t know if they don’t have the will, but they seem to have seen that it’s a much better investment, a much better rate of return if they look to invest in an electric arc furnace rather than a blast furnace,” Spoores stated. He famous that no steelmaker has constructed a blast furnace in North America for many years.

One chance is that one other firm will step in and make a bid for U.S. Steel.

In 2023, arch-rival Cleveland-Cliffs provided to purchase U.S. Steel for $7 billion. U.S. Steel turned the provide down and ended up accepting the practically $15 billion all-cash provide from Nippon Steel, which is the deal that Biden nixed Friday. Perhaps, analysts say, Cleveland-Cliffs will strive once more.

In a press release, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro warned U.S. Steel administration towards “threatening the roles and livelihoods of the Pennsylvanians who work on the Mon Valley Works and at U.S. Steel HQ and their households.’’

Shapiro additionally stated firms that put in bids to purchase U.S. Steel sooner or later should make the identical commitments to “capital funding and defending and rising Pennsylvania jobs that Nippon Steel positioned on the desk.’’

___

Marc Levy reported from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.