“Your daughter has committed suicide. This statement has not stopped chasing Antonio Buza for six years and has not spared efforts to refute it in all this time. They are the words that the Judge of Instruction of Carmona snapped that in 36 hours the death closed in strange circumstances of his daughter Ana, a 19-year-old girl whose body appeared in the gutter of the A-4 on September 7, 2019, when he asked to reopen the case. Buza always thought that her daughter did not launch for her own will of the vehicle that was driving who her partner was then and now accused, Rafael V., but that it was this who ran over her deliberately and will finally be able to confront her thesis before a popular jury. This has been ruled by the Provincial Court of Seville that has ruled that, contrary to what the Women’s Court number 2 of Seville failed last December, the death of Ana Buza should not be judged as a reckless homicide, but as a painful one and it will be the members of the jury who must elucidate what happened that morning.
“We are utterly certain that this particular person might be convicted and can enter jail for the crime so critical,” sources close to Buza, which has declined to make statements to this newspaper so as not to hinder the outcome of a case that, finally, it seems that he puts himself on his side. “He has by no means needed revenge, solely human justice,” they affect
The car of the room is very blunt and questions the version that the forensic doctors and the Civil Guard had maintained, who have always stated that “Ana Buza’s death is not compatible with an outrage by the vehicle and yes with the exit of the vehicle of the vehicle in progress when it circulated at a speed of 117 kilometers hour,” according to the report presented by the Prosecutor’s Office, which has always given the credibility of those experts. However, the magistrates consider that the hypothesis of the outrage, which in all these years has elaborated and based on the legal and scientific team that has surrounded Buza, is the one that “indicated, could better fit our judgment with the injuries and state presented by the victim’s body, with the damage of the vehicle and with the brands and vestiges found in the area of the highway where the incident occurred.”
“We estimate that the thesis of the particular accusation that the death of Ana Buza occurred by an outrage for the right side of the investigated tourism, when the victim was standing out of the car next to the highway of the highway, it even has important visions of verosimilitude, in front of the initial thesis of the forensic doctors who estimated that death occurred by the exit of the deceased of the decease High speed, in what could have been an autolytic act, ”says the magistrates of the audience.
And to base that conclusion, the five judges of the Chamber not only analyze all the material evidence of the paint scratches presented by the vehicle; the place where the backpack of the young Sevillian was found; The parallel longitudinal marks that he had on his thighs, or the open fracture of the two femures and in the warm of his right leg-“estimates this unimided court that those marks of the thighs may have been suffered by throwing the victim in progress of the car when it circulated at 117 kilometers/hour, they say in the auto-, but that they take into account the“ evasive responses and little responses contradictory ”, offered by Rafael V., in his statement before the Civil Guard.
The defendant first said they had argued; after something crossed on the road and lost control of the vehicle; “On a row,” that while he was driving the car, he noticed a movement of Ana’s white blouse, which was traveling in the right rear seat, and that he, after removing his seat belt – which in other versions had assured that he did not wear – he threw himself back to try to grab it, but that she threw himself into the footwear, losing control of the vehicle that ended up crashing with the chitamies of the highway. “This clarification of the information is sort of unlikely,” say the magistrates, who also consider “unusual” – unimilar and strange are two of the adjectives that the magistrates most use to question the official reports or the statements of the accused and of witnesses, such as his mother – the allusions he made to justify the alleged suicide of his girlfriend that he had just discussed with his father. It was accredited by the private accusation that Ana Buza had finished his first course in the Faculty of Seville with an average grade of 9.24 and several honor license plants, not having started the following course yet, ”the judges point out.
Ana’s family already considered a victory, although somewhat bitter, that the Women’s Court of Seville decided to open abbreviated procedure against her ex -boyfriend, although they did not agree that she was judged by reckless homicide. “It wasn’t an accident, he killed her,” Buza said then to this newspaper. The magistrates of the Provincial Court will give him the opportunity, finally, to be able to demonstrate before a jury his version of the facts with the evidence and analysis that the team of experts have collected in these years in a journey that has not been easy and in which all kinds of negligence have been found in the investigation and legal pitfalls to reopen the case and close an instruction that lasted for five years, in addition to very unpleasant personal surprises.
Macho violence and mobile manipulation
The first arrived 10 days after incinerating his daughter. Then they received an email in which they were informed that Ana had asked for help from a psychologist to treat her boyfriend for her jealous, manipulator, controller and violent behavior. That message determined Buza to reopen the case of his daughter, then running with the insensitivity of the instructional judge that had closed, believing Rafael V’s statements that the young woman had jumped from the vehicle running and without waiting for the results of the autopsy or reports of the Civil Guard of Traffic. The hearing said the judge and ordered the reopening of the case and since then the experts hired by Buza concluded that death did not occur by an outrage.
Although from the analysis of the mails that young people were exchanged, it followed that Rafael V. exercised a situation of harassment, jealousy and manipulation, the cause would still take another three years to move on to a gender violence court. However, the magistrates of the Provincial Court have not considered that there is a crime against moral integrity, as the young woman’s family requested, for understanding that “although the relationship between the parties could be toxic and the investigated to suffer a problem of jealousy and maintain an absorbing and monophating attitude, it does not appear that Rafael V. would have exercised physical violence, nor that it would have poured insulting or threatening expressions Psychic against Ana Buza. ”
The judges have also not admitted the appeal of the private accusation to investigate Rafael V. for a crime against intimacy, which Buza’s family has based on evidence that his daughter’s ex -boyfriend had manipulated his mobile – which appeared on the scene of the events 19 days later – before and after his death. The Chamber considers that it was her parents who gave the girl the girl the girl voluntarily so that he could eliminate files of intimate content and that the investigated knew the password of Ana’s cell phone.
However, the sources close to the family argue that before the jury all these evidence related to the macho violence that Rafael V. exerted on Ana and the post -mortem manipulation of her mobile will be presented to make it seem that she had committed suicide. “All the people who have worked on the cause and the Justice group for Ana [que ha mantenido vivo el recuerdo del caso con concentraciones y marchas en estos años] They are looking forward to trial, ”indicate the interlocutors consulted.
Buza by no means needed to search out out, because the decide of instruction threw him, that his daughter had dedicated suicide. Not solely did he discover out, however he by no means believed it. At this time he has fought to know what actually occurred that morning of September 7, 2019. He is evident and now, lastly, he has the chance for the 9 jurors to check their experiences and proof and make clear a “clearly complex event”, as outlined by the Seville viewers.
https://elpais.com/espana/andalucia/2025-03-25/la-muerte-de-ana-buza-sera-juzgada-como-homicidio-doloso-tras-seis-anos-de-intensa-pelea-por-parte-de-sus-padres.html