C‘is probably essentially the most putting determine within the survey carried out with 504 mayors of France: whereas 48 % of them take into account that safety is a crucial topic (determine which will increase because the municipality is rising, to reach at 77 % in Île-de-France), greater than half of the respondents-56 %-have the sensation of being deserted by the State on this query and “to dowle, the state ”. A figure that climbs to 83 % in Île-de-France.
“It goes beyond a request for additional direct resources,” decrypts Thibault de Montbrial, founding father of the Center for Reflection on Internal Security which commissioned this survey at Ifop. “It is more a request for additional prerogatives. Mayors want more rights on security issues, more latitude of action. The public force cannot everything, it takes a co -production of security and therefore go to the end of the logic. »»
A reading that our interlocutor, a lawyer by profession, draws exchanges which he has multiplied with mayors for 18 months and the development of conferences given across the country on the themes of security and sovereignty.
Expand the prerogatives of municipal police officers
Thus, 74 % of interviewees want a simplification of administrative procedures allowing the installation of surveillance cameras, and this even concerns 95 % of the mayors of Île-de-France consulted. “The councilors want simplification. Because behind the installation of cameras, there is a manifestly excessive regulatory maquis, in particular to have authorization access to images, ”continues Thibault de Montbrial.
Another request: that municipal police can observe identification checks and automobile excavations, akin to their nationwide police cousins. 65 % of respondents are favorable, and as much as 84 % for many who train in Île-de-France. However, whereas retaining in thoughts that solely 15 % of municipalities have a municipal police or nation guards. A determine which hides a big disparity, between the municipalities with greater than 10,000 inhabitants, 95 % of that are outfitted, towards solely 6 % of the municipalities with lower than 2,000 inhabitants and 55 % of the municipalities of two,000 to five,000 inhabitants.
Be consulted and knowledgeable by the State
To uncover
The kangaroo of the day
Answer
The different aspect of the survey considerations the data to which elected officers consider they need to have entry to the state to handle their municipality at greatest. In this security survey, a query is requested about migratory distribution and divulges that 89 % of the mayors questioned declare to be consulted for the set up of refugees of their commune. They additionally take into account that this set up is topic to the vote of the municipal council. “When the State makes the decision to distribute migrants in the regions, he puts the mayors before the fait accompli,” stated the founding father of the CRSI, “while it mobilizes municipal establishments and/or social housing. It is in small cities that it creates the most destabilization. »»
The same dynamic is observed on the issue of S files, for “state safety”: 93 % of mayors want to be informed when an individual with this profile lies in their municipality. However, the survey does not specify to the mayors interviewed the different types of radicality for which an individual can be the object of this administrative follow -up (religious, political, hooliganism, etc.). For Thibault de Montbrial, “mayors see the chance of creating a house for radicalization with the capability of those people to proselytize”. And to conclude that these final two gadgets mirror the requests of the inhabitants to not be put earlier than the fait accompli for state selections which can have penalties on cohesion within the municipality.
https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/securite-les-maires-abandonnes-par-l-etat-29-03-2025-2586008_23.php