I’ve the very best impressions of the American cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, chosen Pope with the identify of Leo XIV, which affords the primary observe of one of many doable priorities of his preach: the protection of the rights of the working class. Leo XIII was the Pope of the Of the revolutionaryof 1891, an encyclical that gave rise to the social doctrine of the Church, continued by its successors with nice significance as Octogessima arrivingof 1971, of Pope Paul VI; Work exercising y centessimus yrby John Paul II, and The pleasure of the Gospel2013, of Pope Francis, unquestionably probably the most revolutionary of all, during which he affirms that neoliberalism is unfair at his root.
For my journeys to Peru over the last 25 years, I’ve intently adopted the trajectory of Father Agustino Prevost as a missionary and bishop in that nation and I’ve the very best impressions about his theological and pastoral exercise, shared with theologian colleagues, theologians and bishops Peruvian mates. In latest years, it was an in depth collaborator of Pope Francis, who commissioned him to the presidency of some of the vital dicasteries of the Vatican Curia, the election of bishops.
At the second, I want to provide some options in order that your preach is traditionally that means and might reply to the good challenges of the change of period we live. Actually, they’re quite needs that I believe coincide with an vital sector of Christians of the twenty first century. The first is my want to proceed the political, financial, social and ecological considering of Pope Francis, who offered in his encyclicals The pleasure of the Gospel, Laudato Si ‘, on the citizen of the frequent home y All brothers. The horizon in all of them is the protection of the frequent good, the denunciation of the globalization of indifference to the struggling of the impoverished fashionable majorities and the idolatry of cash. Leo XIV is aware of very effectively that Francisco’s thought and follow on this topic is in full concord with the Gospel of Jesus of Nazareth, which declares the incompatibility between serving God and cash.
The second want that I want to be executed directly is the democratization of the Church, which Pope Francis failed to hold out, regardless of his criticism of clericalism and the protection of synodality. The Catholic Church nonetheless has a hierarchical, pyramid, patriarchal and clerical construction. In it the Pope, the bishops and the clergymen have all the facility. In this area I believe he lives put in in a transparent contradiction. Defend human rights and democracy in society, however don’t follow them in its bosom. It is critical that Leo XIV generates channels of participation of Christians in making a very powerful choices of the lifetime of the Church and within the alternative of its leaders democratization inside its bosom is critical situation for his or her message to be credible and in order that the saying isn’t utilized “tips sell, but for me I do not have”.
My third want is that democratization be executed from a gender perspective. The Catholic hierarchy, together with the Vatican, is right this moment some of the efficient patriarchy protection bastions. In this area, Pope Francis made some advances by putting ladies in positions of accountability throughout the Vatican curia. But it’s not sufficient. It is critical that the reform of the Church be carried out underneath two rules, that of equality and that of parity, each with anthropological and evangelical foundation. The anthropological foundation is similar dignity and the identical rights and duties of all human beings with out gender discrimination. The evangelical base is the equal motion of women and men that Jesus of Nazareth launched. If the Church isn’t democratized from the gender perspective, the Patriarchy model will take, which is in open contradiction with democracy.
https://elpais.com/opinion/2025-05-08/la-trayectoria-de-un-papa-misionero.html