In the corruption course of across the Azerbaijan affair, the previous CSU member of the Bundestag Eduard Lintner has granted the forwarding of Azerbaijanic cash funds to a CDU MP. However, he defended this in entrance of the Munich Higher Regional Court (OLG) as regular lobbyism: “I thought the whole thing is the kind of lobbyism that is still practically omnipresent,” he stated.
According to the indictment, Azerbaijan is claimed to have tried to affect selections within the European Council (PACE) parliamentary meeting with the assistance of cash funds in his favor for years. And partly with the assistance of Lintner, who was sitting within the Bundestag for 33 years, was briefly parliamentary State Secretary and a tempo member till 2010. According to the Munich General Prosecutor’s Office, the 80-year-old is claimed to have obtained a “multiple million amount” for overseas mailbox firms via 2016. Among different issues, he’s stated to have forwarded the cash to the now deceased CDU member of the Bundestag, who ought to affect selections within the sense of Azerbaijans after Lintner himself was now not a member of the European Council. The indictment in opposition to him is subsequently particularly on bribery mandate.
Lintner confirmed that Azerbaijan paid cash to the MP – and admitted that this cost was made “about us”, ie via his firm. A corresponding settlement was “certain”, stated Lintner when requested – however he couldn’t keep in mind particulars. But it was carried out because the Azerbaijani facet wished to design it, “and they wanted to do it about us,” stated ex-CSU politician. Lintner argued that he himself by no means hid the funds, however all the time appropriately said. And he was too assumed that the CDU MP stories funds to the Bundestag. However, the presiding choose countered that it was by no means said that cash had come from Azerbaijan. It is assumed that the nation wished to disguise its origin.
Lintner had already described the allegations within the indictment as right final week. When requested DPA, he later stated that he stated that the info have been true. A But that isn’t confessed He argued: “In my view, this is not a bribery.” The presiding choose now stated: If you give the accusation allegation, this might be thought-about a confessed admission and have to be taken into consideration as mitigating. “As we legally evaluate it, that’s our beer.”
The process goes on the house straight: After a couple of additional trial days, the court docket is now focusing on Plädoyers and judgment for the tip of July. In addition to Lintner, the method was initially additionally within the course of Ex-CDU MP Axel Fischer From the constituency of Karlsruhe-Land and Two different accused have been charged. Fischer, which is accused of bribery, has the Allegations contested prices – like Lintner till the tip. Until a remaining conviction applies to everybody concerned.
After a sickness of Fischer and an extended interruption, the process has now been separated from him – and this process had been suspended after which needed to restart later, stated a court docket spokesman. The proceedings in opposition to the 2 different co -accused have been briefly terminated in opposition to the cost of a cash requirement.
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/bundestagswahl/liveticker-zur-merz-regierung-dobrindt-verfassungsschutzgutachten-reicht-nicht-fuer-verbotsverfahren-faz-110093143.html
