“France must be an example for Europe on universal feminism” | EUROtoday

C ‘is a proposal for a European decision which will react sure events. Carried by the deputy Emmanuelle Hoffman (collectively for the Republic), the proposal entitled “for a universal feminism justice, equality and secularism”, that The level was in a position to seek the advice of completely was supported by 45 deputies, together with the previous authorities spokesperson Prisca Thévenot or the previous ministers Éric Woerth, Stéphane Travert and Brigitte Klinkert.

Eager to defend universalist feminism, confronted with sure excesses of “intersectional” activism, the proposal for alert decision on declines for girls’s rights in sure nations akin to Poland, Hungary, Italy, the United States and clearly Afghanistan. More broadly, this proposal needs to register the idea of common feminism sooner or later technique of the European Union, by supporting associations which defend universalist feminism but in addition by refusing the granting of funding to teams that promote separatism.

This want for motion is a part of the choice of the French Minister in command of Europe Benjamin Haddad who introduced on Monday 19 May his want to “strengthen control” of European funding which may benefit from associations “linked to anti -Semitism or Islamism”. The textual content additionally remembers the occasions of March 8, 2025 throughout the International Day for Women’s Rights in Paris the place Jewish activists from the collective “We will live” couldn’t parade alongside different ladies, after being excluded by demonstrators, threatening their safety.

The level: Why did you carry this European decision proposal?

Emmanuelle Hoffman: The exclusion of collectives We will reside and lady Azadi throughout the March 8, 2025 march was an electroshock. It has grow to be pressing to recall what common feminism is, clearly too typically forgotten. I needed to reaffirm a basic precept: equality between women and men, but in addition between all ladies. Because when a feminist wrestle rejects sure ladies, she deny herself. Universal feminism doesn’t deny discrimination – linked to incapacity, origins, faith or sexual orientation. He encompasses them to raised combat them. What we refuse are the ideological and group drifts that fragment as a substitute of bringing collectively. It is within the National Assembly, and shortly on a European scale, that this message should be carried. And this deserves to be inscribed in a transparent textual content, past a easy platform.

How do you propose to mobilize the Member States round this imaginative and prescient, realizing their divisions on the themes linked particularly to secularism?

We should first reach mobilizing in France. The proposal will go step-by-step: first in committee, then to the hemicycle. What makes the power of this textual content are its vocation to beat our borders. I’m very optimistic: I’m satisfied that we’ll have relays all through Europe. Admittedly, every nation has its personal studying of secularism, however we are going to transcend these variations. This sorority, we will put on it in every single place in Europe, wherever ladies’s rights are nonetheless to be defended and strengthened. Universal feminism remembers a necessary factor: it ought to by no means be instrumentalized. And this combat, it’s carried by ladies, but in addition by males. We even have 27 ladies’s signatories and 18 males’s signatories. It is key: if feminism stays a combat solely carried by ladies, then we now have already misplaced a battle. When I went to get help from the deputies, I didn’t marvel in the event that they had been males or ladies. What was supposed was to defend a transpartisan, deeply humanist message within the service of equality.

You didn’t supply all of the events to signal it, nevertheless …

When I observe, by way of many exchanges on different topics, the positions of sure events – particularly on the far left as within the far proper, on basic ideas, I discover it laborious to supply them to decide to my facet. My worry is the hierarchy of fights. However, this decision is exactly against it: it refuses to categorise the struggles, it embraces all of them whereas respecting republican values. It is a query of political coherence.Read too March 8 march: “Our Jewish activism is republican and universalist”

How might this proposal concretely strengthen ladies’s rights within the area, extra significantly in nations the place they’re threatened right now?

To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

Answer

We are all of the hyperlinks of the identical chain. Gathering round this proposal not solely of deputies, but in addition dedicated residents, elected or not, is crucial. The goal is obvious: to undertake this decision in France, then export it. Because the pressure of the quantity counts. The extra we are going to defend common feminism, the extra this precept will grow to be apparent, together with for individuals who resist it. The majorities contain, they go for the course. And we would like France to be an instance, that the National Assembly results in different European parliaments to open this debate. And there may be an emergency. I’m deeply fearful about sure current drifts. This textual content shouldn’t be a proposal for an emotion decision, it’s a textual content of alert, of response, virtually survival. We should say, black on white, ideas that ought to be widespread sense. But exactly, avoiding the political instrumentalization of feminism has grow to be an actual combat. As we noticed throughout March 8, 2025, this combat is typically misguided. And that’s exactly why it’s important to act now!

Signatory deputies:
– Emmanuelle Hoffman (EPR)
– Éric Woerth (EPR)
– Stéphane Travert (EPR)
– Olivia Gregoire (EPR)
– Brigitte Klinkert (EPR)
– Prisca Thévenot (EPR)
– David Amiel (EPR)
– Stéphane Buchou (EPR)
– Eleonore CAROI (EPR)
– Vincent Caure (EPR)
– Lionel Causse (EPR)
– François Cormier-Bouligeon (EPR)
– Julie Delpech (EPR)
– Nicole Dubré-Chirat (EPR)
– Jean-Marie Fiévet (EPR)
– Constance the GRIPP (EPR)
– Sandrine Josso (Democrats)
– Jean Laussucq (EPR)
– Vincent Ledoux (EPR)
– Mathieu Lefèvre (EPR)
– Pauline Levasseur (EPR)
– Delphine Lingemann (Democrats)
– Sylvain Maillard (EPR)
– Stéphane Mazars (EPR)
– Graziella Melchior (EPR)
– Annaïg Le Meur (EPR)
– Laure Miller (EPR)
– Joséphine Missoffe (EPR)
– Jean Mouilliere (horizons and impartial)
– Christine Le Nabour (EPR)
– Sophie Panonacle (EPR)
– Natalia Pouzyreff (EPR)
– Constance of Pélichy (Liot)
– Stéphanie Rist (EPR)
– Charles Rodwell (EPR)
– Anne-Sophie Ronceret (EPR)
– Jean-François Rousset (EPR)
– Bertrand Sorre (EPR)
– Liliana Tanguy (EPR)
– Jean Terlier (EPR)
– Annie Vidal (EPR)
– Corinne Vignon (EPR)
– Anne-Cécile Violand (horizons and impartial)
– Caroline Yadan (EPR)
– Isabelle Rauch (horizons and impartial)