Eurovision threw the curtain six days in the past, however the echoes of controversy nonetheless resonate for the shadow of buy of mass votes to profit Israel for political causes. There are a number of suspicious issues: to start with, it’s the second time that the Spanish public votes to the nation Hebrero with the utmost rating and grants the well-known 12 factors (which is putting as a result of there are 27 contributors). Last yr, spokesmen of the Israeli authorities itself admitted to mobilize public assets to favor their candidate outdoors their borders. What, added to the marketing campaign in ultras options outdoors the Eurovisive neighborhood, has been gasoline for tongo accusations. Therefore, final Monday, RTVE despatched a letter to the European Broadcasting Union (UER), organizer of the competition, through which he demanded an audit of the Spanish outcome and a “complete review” of the system.
The black hand accusations are as outdated as the tv contests themselves: they’ve been given in Eurovision, but additionally in different codecs with Televoto, akin to Operation Triunfo, Big Brother, Factor X or Survivors. In the center of storms like this one, who watches the Televoto? How is it licensed that there isn’t a black hand in tv competitions the place the general public decides with their cash? Are there authorized ensures? A gaggle of jurists consulted by the nation clarify how the transparency of those competitions works.
Who writes the principles?
First, it ought to be famous that in Spain the promoters are obliged to write down and produce to gentle the authorized foundation of this kind of competitions. These paperwork element the ins and outs of the voting course of, for instance, what number of occasions the identical particular person can vote, how the votes, the worth or why official means will be voted. The widespread is to deposit these papers within the Los Notarios portal, referred to as Abaco; While they aren’t the notaries, however the promoters, those that write them.
Is the presence of an impartial third get together, akin to an auditor or a notary necessary, who screens the vote?
No. In Spain there isn’t a authorized obligation to certify the outcomes of the televoto of this kind of competitions by means of a notary or an exterior auditor. The General Law of Audiovisual Communication requires that TV applications present “clear, truthful and transparent information,” he explains Isabella Penelope, legislation agency lawyer Lawnevertheless, this obligation doesn’t come into particulars concerning the televoto. However, though there isn’t a obligation to audit the calls or messages of assist, the widespread, the skilled provides, is that the producers hold their backs and doc the method, and even rent third events observers, to avoid wasting issues.
Can a notary certify the results of a tv contest?
It has been a determine intently linked to the tv present: the notary is introduced as an older, critical man, with darkish go well with, glasses and tie that provides an auea of officiality and legality to every part he touches. The actuality is {that a} notary can not be sure that the vote of a tv contest was truthful or moral. “Only attests to what he sees, hears or perceives for his senses at a certain time and time,” he explains María Teresa Barea, spokesman for the General Council of Notaries.
“The notary’s intervention is limited to the act of presence of the draw or contest; that is, to be present during the time of celebration and attest to what happens there.” The notary can attest that, for instance, in a selected day and time the display screen of a pc yielded the title of a contestant after counting just a few votes; nevertheless, You can not be sure that the system labored appropriately or that every one ballots have been counted correct. Nor rule out that telematics vote was the results of a orchestrated motion, for instance, for political causes.
Is it attainable to go to exterior auditors to make sure that the televoto was truthful?
Yes. It is the most typical and dependable. “It is important that voting platforms (SMS, apps, web) have control systems to avoid automated mass voting, duplicities or manipulations,” he says Sara Gutiérrez, lawyer of singular legislation. Also “that is counted are services of technological operators or specialized companies that generate verifiable technical reports.” In Eurovision, for instance, the corporate answerable for voting administration in Eurovision has been the German eleven.
What are the most typical fraud?
“The most common conflicts include accusations of manipulation of votes or fraud in participation,” explains lawyer Isabella Penelope. There have been circumstances of claims for misleading promoting or by breach of the competition bases; or for detecting synthetic site visitors to change outcomes (celebrities bots). The lawyer additionally warns of circumstances of antecedents of improper use of further tarification strains; or fraudulent diversion of calls to acquire financial advantages.
Can you declare?
Yes, however it’s not easy. With the legislation in hand, lawyer Sara Gutiérrez explains that the suspicions of Tongo or fraud in these competitions will be denounced in entrance of organizations akin to self -control, the National Commission of Markets and Competition (CNMC), and in the end ratio, in judicial means.
https://elpais.com/economia/mis-derechos/2025-05-23/eurovision-operacion-triunfo-gran-hermano-supervivientes-quien-vigila-que-en-los-concursos-con-televoto-no-hay-tongo.html