The gender hole within the work setting, or what’s the identical, discrimination as a result of gender by way of wage efficiency obtained by performing an comparable job, stays a actuality that penalizes girls in Spain. However, this distinction between staff has reduce in 5.9 proportion factors over the past 20 years, till it’s 15.9%. This has occurred, amongst different causes, for a sure segregation in jobs in the direction of which girls decide, that are nonetheless removed from probably the most technological professions. This is likely one of the most important conclusions of the Quarter Observatory of the Labor Market that Fedea has introduced this Friday, through which he has devoted a particular chapter to research labor distinctions between women and men from 2002 to 2025.
“Although the salary gap has been reduced, women continue to charge less than men, even after considering age differences, contract type, type of day, sector or company size,” says the research, ready by José-Iignacio Conde-Ruiz, deputy director of Fedea. In this second comparative class – the primary staff have been equated with the identical age and academic degree – which affords way more adjusted values to work actuality, the discount can also be hanging and even considerably larger, though the ultimate outcomes proceed to be positioned in each figures: it has dropped from 18.7% to 12% (6.7 much less factors).

“We are talking about a woman with the same studies, in the same sector, and with an equal position in a company, wins, on average, 3,500 euros less a year than a man,” stated Claudia Hupkau, Associate Professor at Cunef, who has participated in a debate after the presentation of the report. “Without these contrast factors, the difference is double,” he added.
Within this primary discriminatory scenario, the research warns that genera variations are restricted barely relying on the age of staff. “The adjusted salary differential is lower among young people (4%) and older among people over 59 (exceeds 15%),” the report particulars. Nor does the extent of research steadiness the steadiness: “In 2022 (the last salary structure survey that takes the study), the gap is above 11% in all groups, indicating that education, by itself, does not correct gender salary inequalities”.
The identical goes for historic instances: “Over time, the adjusted gender wage gap is systematically greater among people with more years of permanence in the company,” the research displays. “In 2022, the gap almost doubles among those who have been (14.0 %) for more than 7 years) with respect to those who have been (7.8 %), complete.
One of the sections that best shows the greatest complications that women still have today to find a work appropriate to their aspirations is the one that shows how they remain the ones that take the greatest number of part -time jobs when they do not seek this type of reduced days. “Almost 70% of people that work half -time are girls, and their wage hole reaches 9.6%,” the document said.
Behind the reasons that are still in force these differences are, in Hupkau’s opinion, some behaviors inherent in each sex, and that, in the case of women, are evidenced in their predilection for accessing sectors such as sanitary, instead of other more masculinized spaces such as STEM races (science, technology, engineering and mathematics).
“Women proceed to decide on works worse than males, and even when they’re a majority in some areas with higher salaries, comparable to docs, it is usually noticed that they cost much less,” said the expert. “Women are overrepresented in actions comparable to well being, training and home work, whereas their presence is marginal in development, transport or extractive business, amongst different sectors,” complements the text.
This predilection for some work spaces, and that hides reluctance still anchored in the aspirations of many women, results in “high occupational segregation”, which can only be resolved with an abrupt change in the activity sector. “More than 25% of girls must change their occupation to realize equitable gender distribution,” the text affects.
More aid
Although the study does not analyze it, during the subsequent colloquium, both its author, Count Ruiz, and Hupkau, have referred to motherhood and the elephant in the room of labor discrimination. Despite assessing measures such as equalization in the number of weeks of maternity and paternity permits (16), both have expressed their doubts regarding whether only these types of actions can break with very anilored dynamics in the natural behavior of many men.
“The low cost answer has been chosen,” said Conde Ruiz. “These permits price lower than giving assist to entry nurseries and, as well as, it has not been complemented with different kinds of support for younger households,” he added. “The gap is due to maternity and the different impact between men and women. I believe in the policies that are being carried out, but I believe that the evidence is not overwhelming to make leaps of joy, since, for the moment, we do not see a great increase in the involvement of men in these care tasks. It still needs time, but it would be much more effective public can intervene, ”Hupkau has accomplished.
https://elpais.com/economia/2025-05-23/las-mujeres-cobran-de-media-3500-euros-menos-al-ano-que-los-hombres-pese-a-la-reduccion-de-la-brecha-de-genero.html