Climate scientists sound alarm over ‘deeply concerning’ EPA plans to take away limits on energy plant emissions | EUROtoday

Climate scientists sound alarm over ‘deeply concerning’ EPA plans to take away limits on energy plant emissions
 | EUROtoday

Climate scientists are slamming plans from Donald Trump’s administration to finish limits on greenhouse gasoline emissions from energy vegetation.

The Environmental Protection Agency is drafting a plan to finish all limits on greenhouse gases emitted by coal and gas-fired energy vegetation, The New York Times studies.

The company argues that the greenhouse gases emitted by these vegetation “do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution,” in accordance with a draft plan reviewed by the newspaper.

However, fossil fuels are the “single largest industrial source of climate destabilizing carbon dioxide in the U.S.,” in accordance with Vickie Patton, normal counsel for the Environmental Defense Fund. The United States is without doubt one of the world’s prime greenhouse gasoline producers —second solely to China.

The new rule is “an abuse of the E.P.A.’s responsibility under the law,” Patton mentioned.

Emissions fume from Texas's Oak Grove Power Plant. The U.S. is the world's second-largest producer of greenhouse gas emissions

Emissions fume from Texas’s Oak Grove Power Plant. The U.S. is the world’s second-largest producer of greenhouse gasoline emissions (Getty Images)

The company despatched the draft to the White House on May 2, and it’s anticipated to be launched in June, in accordance with The Times.

Climate scientists say the potential transfer is “deeply concerning.”

“If true, this is a deeply concerning move from the Trump EPA,” in accordance with Dr. Gretchen Goldman, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“There is no meaningful path to reducing U.S. carbon emissions without limiting greenhouse gas emissions from coal and gas-fired power plants — the largest domestic stationary source of [greenhouse gases],” she wrote.

“This is an agency with ‘environmental protection’ in its name and it is trying to slow down phasing out of these plants and disincentivize renewables,” added environmental researcher Dr. Diren Kocakuşak.

Patrick Drupp, director of local weather coverage on the Sierra Club, informed The Washington Post the transfer is “reprehensible” and designed to “curry favor and earn some brownie points with the fossil-fuel industry.”

Lee Zeldin’s EPA needs to finish all limits on greenhouse gases emitted by coal and gas-fired energy vegetation, however local weather scientists say the transfer might be disastrous (AP)

The rule comes after a 2022 Supreme Court resolution that mentioned the EPA can’t pressure utilities to close down coal vegetation and swap to renewable power sources.

The Trump administration’s new rule may also overturn guidelines launched in President Joe Biden’s closing yr in workplace, which sought to restrict U.S. greenhouse gasoline emissions.

“Many have voiced concerns that the last administration’s replacement for that rule is similarly overreaching and an attempt to shut down affordable and reliable electricity generation in the United States, raising prices for American families, and increasing the country’s reliance on foreign forms of energy,” an EPA spokesperson mentioned in a press release to The Independent.

The proposal shall be revealed after an interagency evaluate and approval from EPA chief Lee Zeldin, the spokesperson mentioned.

“In reconsidering the Biden-Harris rule that ran afoul of Supreme Court case law, we are seeking to ensure that the agency follows the rule of law while providing all Americans with access to reliable and affordable energy,” Zeldin mentioned in a press release.

The rule will possible face authorized challenges as soon as it’s official, however some say it may open the door for additional deregulation.

“If the administration is going to do this, it is the strategically smartest way,” Jonathan Adler, a legislation professor at Case Western University, informed the Times.

“If they’re successful with regard to power plants, they’re pretty much going to be successful with everything else,” he added.

https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/trump-epa-power-plant-emissions-b2757737.html