The Assembly largely adopts the invoice | EUROtoday

Lhe outcome was anticipated: on the meeting, assist and opponents of the invoice giving the correct to die agreed to foretell that it might be adopted, at first studying, to a snug majority – and it was, in actual fact, by 305 votes to 199. The textual content on assist and palliative care, for its half, was voted unanimously. During the 2 weeks and a few hundred hours of debate dedicated to the tip of life, the Assembly “honored and raised up to the issues,” mentioned President Yaël Braun-Pivet, opening the session on Tuesday: the exchanges had been “worthy, respectful of everyone’s convictions”.

They had been, it is true. And the audio system who observe each other within the gallery earlier than the vote are many to talk of their “humility” within the face of the gravity of the topic, of their “vertigo” typically, of their “respect”, too, for the sick and the caregivers. Agreed phrases, apparently, however which right here accounts for the character of the discussions. The textual content cleaned throughout the completely different parliamentary teams: if it was massively supported to the left of the hemicycle and rejected by the correct and the intense proper, Tuesday’s votes present nuances. 19 deputies of the nationwide rally supported the invoice, in opposition to 101 votes in opposition to; 11 Elected collectively for the Republic opposed it, 14 abstained, 64 authorized it. Just a few hours earlier than the vote on Tuesday, Prime Minister François Bayrou-who had requested for the 2 parts of the textual content to be split-himself affirmed on BFMTV that he would have abstained.

“We can be courteous without hearing”

“These twelve days have certainly not made it possible to exhaust the debate, they even raised new questions at home, recognizes the Yannick Monnet (Democratic and Republican left), but they also have confirmed convictions, on both text. The first, on palliative care, “requires a dedication to rupture this authorities and those that observe,” said the deputy. The second, “shakes up” our very conception of care and medicine: it collectively demands to be “vigilant”, and to continue “to listen to the reluctance, and even the refusals”. The help of dying, continues Yannick Monnet, can only be a measure “of final attraction, protector each for the one who requests it and for caregivers: this proper doesn’t consecrate the liberty to decide on their loss of life, however ensures folks to have the ability to put an finish, in all conscience, to sufferings for which medication can not. »»

“You can be courteous without really hearing the other, without giving price to his word,” regrets Vincent Trébuchet (UDR). The debates had been appeased, in fact … however many of the amendments provided on the correct had been rejected. “If we were collectively unable to impose safeguards,” provides the deputy, “it is undoubtedly that the current was too strong. “But is that this new legislation” is really progress? How many people at the end of their life, sick, disabled will see here a duty to die? “Introducing euthanasia into a rustic the place palliative care will not be sufficiently deployed can be an ethical fault, but additionally a collective defeat, chasing Patrick Hetzel (republican proper): we now have collectively a combat to steer in order that the care of care wins. »»

“A marked and thoughtful path”

“It is not a law that sorts, it is not a law which decides which has the right to live and which must die,” pleads the environmentalist Sandrine Rousseau. It is a legislation that frames, limits, checks, it’s a legislation of prudence. Knowing that you may ask for assist to die means that you can reside, figuring out that you may say cease means that you can expertise the final moments calmly, whether or not you might be asking for or not. To the left of the hemicycle, many deputies additionally regretted that the textual content doesn’t go far enough-by excluding the train of the early tips, specifically, or by making the self-administration of the deadly substance a rule.

To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

Answer

The textual content was rebalanced by the deputies, believes the deputy Horizons and former Minister Agnès Firmin Le Bodo. By including a definition of the “advanced phase” of the illness as “entry into an irreversible process marked by the worsening of the health of the sick person who affects their quality of life”. By the express exclusion of the speculation {that a} psychological struggling alone might open the correct to assist to die. Or by the symbolic withdrawal of the point out of “natural death” on loss of life certificates. “There is no unanimous position in our group, and it is legitimate,” she mentioned Tuesday within the gallery: it’s a textual content that touches everybody’s intimate. I’ll vote it as a result of it provides a marked, considerate path, which responds to the intense complexity of sure finish -of -life conditions: sure, we should hear the misery of those that, even surrounded, even neat, not wish to reside ”.

The textual content remains to be solely at first of his parliamentary profession: he ought to arrive within the Senate at first of the college yr earlier than returning to the Assembly at first of 2026. “I want, mentioned the Minister of Health Catherine Vautrin, that he follows his manner with the identical listening, the identical need to discover a consensus. »»