The main exhibitions on the Prado Museum are often self-explanatory from the signal on the Jerónimos entrance. But that of Antonio Rafael Mengs has required a presentation of primary questions and solutions, as Andrés Úbeda de los Cobos, head of the 18th century and Goya Painting Collection and curator of an exhibition that’s named merely after its protagonist, his personal identify, has confessed. First of all, a declaration of intentions. Who is Mengs? Why was he necessary? And why does he deserve this area now? The painter who was key within the start of Neoclassicism and one of the crucial influential artists of the 18th century has suffered, the professional has assured, an erasure from artwork historical past books that has induced his oblivion to unfold amongst lecturers and most people. For this purpose, they argue from the Prado, they’re as soon as once more organizing an exhibition round his determine – there are three of them – to do not forget that, regardless of his unhealthy character and dogmatism within the imposition of a canon of pictorial magnificence, his determine deserves to be recovered.
Mengs’ life was marked from the second he was born by the determine of his father. “The name they impose on you can determine everything,” mentioned Miguel Falomir, director of the museum, on the presentation this Monday, recalling that the creator obtained the primary names of Antonio Allegri Correggio and Raphael of Urbino, two of the nice painters of the Italian Renaissance. From that second on, as narrated within the 10 chapters that make up the exhibition with 159 items, Mengs’ future was constrained between the calls for and excessive stage of expectations positioned on him by his father, and those who he imposed on himself. “The way in which he identified beauty and formal perfection, his technique, made him an obsessive painter,” defined Úbeda de los Cobos. “He said that his works were never finished, he continued to the point of desperation, he was always dissatisfied.”
The instance is, Javier Jordán de Urríes, the opposite curator and conservator of 18th century portray on the National Heritage, has additionally identified, in his nearly clear brush strokes, which allowed him to return to them time and again till he achieved the impact he needed. It is that enamel with which he completed his works and that now shines within the Prado.
Mengs developed his profession between Dresden, Rome and Madrid at a time when what was often known as virtuous competitiveness ruled the work of artists in European courts. That is, the monarchs put giant quantities of cash on the desk to get the perfect artists. Once the provide was accepted, the kings inspired the fiercest and most voracious of battles between the painters. Toxic dynamics, eminently masculinized, with the last word objective of having the ability to exhibit the perfect artworks in entrance of the remainder of the royalty. “Rivalry and competition are extraordinary drivers for the promotion of talent in art,” mentioned Falomir.
In the case of Mengs, Charles III locked him within the Royal Palace to color, wall to wall, with Tiepolo, at a time, within the mid-18th century, when Madrid was, lastly, acknowledged as a pictorial capital on the European circuit. “They were the moon and the sun,” defined the director of the Prado. There are not any paperwork that certify, Falomir recalled, how the monarch helped convey out Mengs’ expertise primarily based on stress and, most likely, lies about his colleague’s work, however there’s a lengthy custom of perfecting this system between monarchs and popes.
If this case soured his character, the way in which during which he laid the foundations of Neoclassicism didn’t assist him make pals amongst his contemporaries. “He decided to radically change the foundations of European painting, placing classical sculpture and the tradition of the ancient world at the center,” mentioned the curator. “At that time, Europeans did not travel to Greece; therefore, his bet lacked practical reality. But he defended that the classical world had created absolute beauty and, therefore, contemporary painters of that time could only copy it.” One extra truth: anybody who did not do it had his most absolute contempt.
That is why he denigrated the nationwide faculties within the locations the place he labored. In Spain, he rejected the work of Murillo and Velázquez, whom he thought of good painters, however referred to as them ignorant for not following their postulates. “He was very vehement and wanted everyone to paint with the same creed, which is why he generated conflicts in his environment,” Úbeda de los Cobos identified.
He solely had an ideal ally on this proselytizing job with Greek classicism. The German archaeologist Johann Joachim Winckelmann opened his eyes to the idea of magnificence that he ought to discover in historical statues. Some of those plasters which can be exhibited within the Prado are a part of Mengs’ private assortment and are positioned subsequent to his works to know his manner of portray the our bodies and expressions of his characters.
Since 1755, the 2 colleagues tried to impose “the artistic superiority of Greek art” that the painter perfected by means of drawing. The exhibition shows 81 that reveal his obsession with method. Five years later, this alliance that had modified the precepts of European portray dissolved like a sugar dice. Mengs falsified a portray to hurt the professional. There are a number of theories that all through historical past have tried to make clear this betrayal, the purest envy is certainly one of them. The artist could not have felt sufficiently acknowledged by Winckelmann in his writings, reads the exhibition posters.
“His greatest rival has always been History,” added Úbeda de los Cobos to complete outlining the portrait of Mengs. The artist lived in everlasting problem with Raphael of Urbino, often known as “the prince of painters” for his work and his affect on the work of his successors. “He always wanted to surpass him,” mentioned Falomir. He tried it from imitation and ended up being thought of disrespectful of the instructor’s reminiscence. There is an instance within the Prado exhibition within the work Lamentation over lifeless Christ: a board weighing greater than 300 kilos and greater than three meters excessive, the identical dimensions of the Amazement of Sicily by Raphael.
In the Prado they not solely recuperate the determine of Mengs, they present one other explicit gratitude to the painter who satisfied Charles III to not burn the nudes within the royal collections. “Thanks to him we have paintings by Titian that would have been lost forever,” mentioned Falomir.
At the top of the in depth exhibition, the essential questions that the curator posed earlier than starting the tour resonate. And he assumes the reply to the explanation for this exhibition: “It has to do with how art is made. There are some basic values such as talent, although it is clear that it is not always the key to an artist’s success. You can also value its transcendence with a different painting followed by others in the chain of history. Mengs is precisely the combination of the two things and Art History has not recognized him,” he added. “These exhibitions suit the Prado well, especially at a time when it seems that museum programs are interchangeable and predictable. Here we are betting on other paradigms,” the professional concluded below the gaze of his boss, Falomir.
https://elpais.com/cultura/2025-11-24/el-prado-recupera-la-figura-de-mengs-el-pintor-de-mal-caracter-olvidado-por-la-historia-que-revoluciono-el-arte.html