“The parliamentary commission of inquiry into public broadcasting is used by its rapporteur for ideological purposes” | EUROtoday

ECan you hear this deafening silence? The one by which the far proper works, methodically, to attempt to deliver journalists who don’t assume prefer it into line.

I’m a Gaullist. I imagine in a powerful State when it protects, not when it intimidates. Strong establishments after they assure freedoms, not after they weaken them. In a democracy, attacking journalists for what they assume, for what they examine or for what they reveal is an absolute crimson line. A free press shouldn’t be a complacent press. It is without doubt one of the situations of the sovereignty of the folks.

I wish to be clear on one important level: I by no means confuse the far proper with its voters. Those who vote for her are neither enemies of the Republic nor residents to be disqualified. They are sometimes the primary victims of manipulation methods, organized anger and deliberate disinformation. Depriving them of free and pluralistic info additionally means depriving them of the means to type an knowledgeable opinion.

Prosecution instruction

Defending press freedom means defending all residents. What is occurring as we speak shouldn’t be anecdotal. Like the far left which beforehand exploited the important instruments of parliamentary management, the far proper wished to create a parliamentary fee of inquiry into the neutrality, operation and financing of public broadcasting, three completely reliable topics furthermore.

You have 73.45% of this text left to learn. The relaxation is reserved for subscribers.