Justice Minister: “We need to tighten up criminal law again” – Hubig desires to take motion in opposition to sexualized AI photographs | EUROtoday

Federal Justice Minister Stefanie Hubig desires to take more durable motion in opposition to the creation and distribution of sexualized photographs generated utilizing synthetic intelligence (AI). “We must protect those affected even better from such AI image manipulations. It must become easier to defend ourselves against violations of personal rights,” stated the SPD politician to the “Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung”. At the identical time, she introduced: “We also need to tighten up criminal law again: We need criminal offenses that specifically address the problem of digital image manipulation.”

The background is, for instance, sexualized photographs generated by the AI ​​Grok on Elon Musk’s on-line platform X. “I think it’s terrible when AI tools like Grok are used to generate masses of lewd images of women – for example by dressing them in provocative bikinis without any consent,” stated Hubig. Personal rights are violated and ladies are “reduced to objects.” The creation of sexualized AI photographs of youngsters and younger individuals is especially reprehensible: “We cannot accept that.”

“Draft for a Digital Violence Protection Act”

Possession and distribution of kid pornography might already be punished with excessive penalties, and AI-generated photographs may be topic to this. There are additionally authorized choices in opposition to manipulated photographs of adults. But that’s not sufficient. “We are currently drafting a digital violence protection law. We want appropriate penalties for deepfakes that violate the personal rights of those affected.”

Another facet is the higher enforceability of 1’s personal rights. Those affected should be capable to guarantee “that the distribution of such images is quickly stopped and that they are removed from the platforms”. This might additionally imply “that accounts through which serious legal violations are repeatedly committed must be temporarily blocked by the platforms.”

Hubig rejected allegations that this may prohibit freedom of expression. “It has nothing to do with censorship.” Freedom of expression ends “where personal rights are violated”. She just isn’t aiming to ban software program or shut down platforms. Regulation is essentially the duty of the EU; She helps the overview of X and Grok initiated by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.