Ashley St Clair, mom of Elon Musk’s baby, sues xAI over Grok deepfakes | EUROtoday

Ashley St Clair, the mom of considered one of Elon Musk’s kids, has sued his firm xAI over sexualised deepfakes of her created on social media platform X.

The lawsuit filed in New York on Thursday alleges the Grok AI instrument created sexually express footage of St Clair.

The guardian firm of X and Grok, xAI, has counter-sued St Clair for violating its phrases of service.

X didn’t reply on to BBC News’s enquiries in regards to the lawsuits.

“We intend to hold Grok accountable and to help establish clear legal boundaries for the entire public’s benefit to prevent AI from being weaponised for abuse,” St Clair’s lawyer Carrie Goldberg informed BBC News.

“By manufacturing nonconsensual sexually explicit images of girls and women, xAI is a public nuisance and a not reasonably safe product,” Goldberg added.

St Clair’s courtroom submitting alleges: “X users dug up photos of St Clair fully clothed at 14 years old and requested Grok undress her and put her in a bikini. Grok obliged”.

It says the imagery created of St Clair was “de facto non-consensual” however Grok’s builders additionally had “explicit knowledge” of her lack of consent.

It additionally claims Grok generated a picture which put St Clair, who’s Jewish, “in a string bikini covered with swastikas”.

In response to her complaints, the submitting says, the corporate “retaliated against her, demonetizing her X account and generating multitudes more images of her”.

Some X premium customers, who pay a month-to-month payment, can obtain a share of promoting income gained from posts which obtain quite a lot of engagement.

In a counter-suit, xAI stated that St Clair had violated their phrases of service by submitting her lawsuit in New York.

The firm’s phrases say disputes with xAI have to be introduced in Texas.

Goldberg informed BBC News the corporate’s counter-suit was “jolting”.

“I have never heard of any defendant suing somebody for notifying them of their intention to use the legal system,” she stated.

“And their mistreatment of her online is mimicked in their legal strategy.”

She added St Clair could be “vigorously defending” her case in New York and that “any jurisdiction will recognise” the grievance.

It was revealed by St Clair in an X put up final yr that she had given delivery to the tech billionaire’s baby – considered one of a minimum of 13 he’s believed to have fathered.

St Clair and Musk are regarded as engaged in a custody battle over their baby.

X got here beneath intense scrutiny from customers, politicians and regulators worldwide over Grok getting used to make non-consensual sexualised imagery of individuals.

Users had been capable of tag the Grok account in posts or replies to posts on the platform and ask it to edit photos to undress folks.

Grok complied with many such requests to provide photo-realistic photos of actual ladies in bikinis and revealing clothes – with studies it additionally produced sexualised photos of youngsters.

On Wednesday, earlier than her courtroom submitting, St Clair informed BBC Newsnight her picture had been “stripped” to seem “basically nude, bent over” regardless of her telling Grok she didn’t consent to the sexualised photos.

She, and different ladies whose photos had been edited utilizing Grok, had stated the location was not doing sufficient to sort out unlawful content material, together with baby sexual abuse imagery.

Following backlash, X modified its guidelines so solely paid customers may use the operate – sparking criticism from ladies’s teams and the UK authorities.

The firm stated on Wednesday that each one X customers would now not be capable to edit photographs of actual folks to point out them in revealing clothes in jurisdictions the place it’s unlawful.

It later up to date its put up to say it will implement “similar geoblocking measures for the Grok app”, which is separate to X.

On Friday, The Guardian reported that it was nonetheless attainable to make use of the standalone Grok app to generate sexualised deepfakes of actual folks and put up them on X “without any sign of it being moderated”.

The UK authorities is bringing into power a legislation which can make it unlawful to create non-consensual intimate photos, and regulator Ofcom remains to be probing whether or not X broke current UK legal guidelines.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp37erw0zwwo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss