Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky, a frequent CNN panelist, took intention at each the community and conservative commentator Scott Jennings in a scathing Substack publish by which she acknowledged the criticism may price her future appearances on CNN.
“I’m fairly confident that this column will get me banned from CNN’s airwaves,” she wrote within the newest difficulty of her “Salty Politics” publication, headlined: “I’m Probably About to Be Banned From CNN — But Someone Has to Say This About Scott Jennings.”
Roginsky made clear her difficulty not that the Trump-loving and -endorsed Jennings is a Republican however “how he behaves, what he contributes, and what his presence signals about what CNN now tolerates.”
She slammed Jennings as having an “at best, optional” relationship with the reality, favoring bluster over debate and accused him of steadily speaking over and displaying disdain towards feminine co-panelists.
The strategist additionally alleged that he selectively edits clips that he shares on social media to make it seem as if he “owned” the individual he was debating as a result of he’s “too chickenshit to post the whole segment that would expose the truth.”
Roginsky stated CNN ought to severely rethink what Jennings brings to the desk and ask itself: “What is Scott Jennings adding that could not be accomplished by any number of conservative analysts who are capable of making arguments without bad-faith theatrics?”
“CNN’s legacy is not guaranteed,” she warned, arguing that persevering with to platform Jennings is actually “a choice to debase discourse, excuse bad behavior, and signal that being loud matters more than being right.”
Jennings and CNN are but to answer the publish.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/julie-roginsky-scott-jennings-viral-post_n_696defe4e4b03601d1a5be7b