The ‘particular relationship’ between Washington and London, the traditionally closest and most important alliance of the transatlantic axis that for many years has linked Europe to the USA, is creaking amidst unprecedented public controversy. The final fuse was sensationally triggered by Donald Trump as soon as once more, concentrating on – in an interview granted to Fox, on the best way again from the Davos Forum – the navy and bloody contribution provided by NATO companions (together with Italy) within the 20 years of invasion of Afghanistan following the assault on 11 September 2001 on the Twin Towers in New York: with phrases brazenly outlined as “offensive” by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who went so far as to invoke for the primary time brazenly the (unlikely) public “apology” of the American president.
The Donald primarily dismissed as irrelevant the function of the contingents of pleasant international locations on the battle outcomes of that battle (which resulted within the humiliating retreat of 2021): contingents that in his opinion would have stored themselves “at a distance” from the entrance line. Not new ‘arguments’ from the tycoon president, who in Davos had already embarrassed the trusted secretary common of NATO, Mark Rutte, compelled to recall how simply over half of the over 4,000 Western troopers killed through the years in Afghanistan wore uniforms with the celebrities and stripes insignia of the forces. But this time they border on the accusation of cowardice and couldn’t go unnoticed within the United Kingdom: within the reminiscence of the tens of 1000’s of women and men despatched there over the course of twenty years and the 457 who misplaced their lives there. Hence the indignant and bipartisan response that exploded on the island, from the political world to the media, from veterans to the households of the fallen.
“An absolute insult”
The first to set fireplace to the mud from the ranks of the federal government celebration was Emily Thornberry, Labor president of the Foreign Affairs Committee within the House of Commons, who branded Trump’s outburst as “an absolute insult”. Conservative opposition MP Ben Obese-Jecty, a former profession officer known as to serve in Afghanistan, was additionally offended, in keeping with whom “it is sad to see the sacrifice of our nation and our NATO partners depreciated in such bad taste”. While criticism has even come from Nigel Farage, tribune of Reform UK, a right-wing celebration of Trumpian inspiration which has been main the polls for a yr.
“How dare Trump?” added Ed Davey, chief of the centrist Liberal Democratic Party who has all the time been hostile to the tycoon, and who for months has denounced the cordially submissive perspective attributed to the prime minister in direction of his large brother from abroad.
«Offensive and disconcerting statements»
In this case, Sir Keir – already shaken by the escalation of disputes over Ukraine, Greenland or the so-called Board of Peace for Gaza (the place London ended up leaving solely Tony Blair in his private capability for now), and able to depart subsequent week for China in quest of some various shore – was unable to again down. After having a Downing Street spokesperson recall the worth of the “sacrifice” made in Afghanistan by the British and allies “in the service of collective security and the common response to the attack” of 9/11, he spoke brazenly: “I consider President Trump’s statements offensive and frankly disconcerting, and I am not surprised that they have caused so much pain to the families of those who were killed or injured”, he lower quick. He then added that, in his sneakers, he would “certainly have apologized”. Even harsher was the remark entrusted to the deputy protection minister, Al Carns, who outlined The Donald’s statements as “completely ridiculous”.
https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/trump-deride-ruolo-alleati-afghanistan-e-starmer-non-ci-sta-AIVUG21