Rachel Reeves is completed – and Angela Rayner’s simply proved why | Politics | News | EUROtoday

She’s acquired a cheek! Angela Rayner positioned herself firmly on the aspect of employers as she warned that hospitality companies have been preventing for survival. Higher enterprise charges, power payments and the hovering price of using workers have been in charge, she stated. It’s a damning indictment of this Labour authorities, and notably of the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves.

But wait a second. Wasn’t Ms Rayner an enormous a part of that authorities for greater than a yr, in her position as Deputy Prime Minister? And didn’t she personally champion adjustments to employment legal guidelines, in addition to will increase to the minimal wage, which have left companies struggling to remain afloat? She talks a few “triple whammy” hitting companies, however she was the one throwing punches.

That’s no consolation to struggling employers, after all. Because whereas Ms Rayner’s Damascene conversion might increase eyebrows, she’s not unsuitable. Hospitality companies are considering extinction, and the Government is making their plight worse, not higher.

It’s additionally no consolation to Rachel Reeves, who now faces criticism from Labour colleagues in addition to the Tories and Reform.

Ms Rayner’s disloyal perspective seems to be like a deliberate effort to place herself as a pal to enterprise, in preparation for a management battle that might start at any time.

Sir Keir Starmer might stay in Number 10 all the way in which till the following normal election, or he might resign tomorrow. The present chaos in Downing Street means nothing is definite.

But if he goes, Ms Rayner hopes to interchange him. Or not less than, that’s what everybody at Westminster believes. And she’s setting out her stall prematurely.

An much more damning verdict, nonetheless, was delivered by Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who complained in a textual content message to Peter Mandelson that the Government was failing to spice up the economic system and had “no growth strategy at all”.

He selected to make the message public, in an try to attempt to neuter criticism that he was too near the disgraced Mandelson. But it was initially supposed to stay non-public, and that’s why his feedback are much more damaging than Ms Rayner’s.

This is what Wes Streeting actually thinks, behind the scenes. He has no religion within the Chancellor – so why ought to the remainder of us?